Margarito fought better quality opposition than Mayweather.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ajlc15, Nov 26, 2010.


  1. ajlc15

    ajlc15 New Member Full Member

    76
    0
    May 31, 2010
    Explain to me again how the DLH who fought mayweather can beat the williams that, as you've said, has the best chance of beating floyd (which btw I completely disagree).


    Wow, I guess I do have to explain your absurd logic. Let's start over:

    HEre is your argument in a nutshell: "Margarito fought a midget. Mayweather would not get the same credit if he were to fight in a comparable midget."

    My argument: "That is irrelevant. That doesn't make sense. We are not arguing whether if not mayweather can beat Margarito's opponent. We are arguing who fought the better opposition."

    Clearly: It's not even up to dispute. You have yet to proposed a convincing argument against MArgarito's top 5 vs MAyweather's top 5

    Margarito's Pacquiao > Mayweather's Marquez
    Margarito's Mosley = Mayweather's Mosley (I gave you this)
    Margarito's undfeated Cotto > Mayweather's Hatton
    Margarito's Paul Williams > Mayweather's DLH
    Margarito's Martinez > Mayweather's Baldomir

    Even if I gave you Mayweather's DLH, Margarito is still ahead by a very wide margin. This is not implying that margarito is better, he is a disgraced scumbag, who will never cracked the top 1000 list. Mayeather is still better and superior, he just fell short when it comes to quality opponent faced.
     
  2. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    My argument is that Margarito even though he's garbage doesn't get as much credit for facing Pacquiao because he was so much bigger. I mentioned Mayweather Marquez because Marquez was also a top p4p fighter yet people dismissed Mayweather's win because of the size difference. My point is that if the Marquez is not considered a quality a opponent because he was smaller, then neither should Pacquiao for Margarito since Pacquiao was much more smaller than Margarito than Marquez was too Mayweather.:deal



    You gave Mosley. I'm saying DLH was better than Williams. That's 2. And I'm saying that Marquez and Pacquiao should be comparable maybe a slight adv to Mayweather. Therefore their resumes are about equal over the last five opponents.
     
  3. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    So why then did he ask JMM for a tune-up fight at 144 then eventuaslly at 146?

    There are hell more fighters at the 140 range that could hurdle the weight difference. JMM is not exactly a "tune-up" fighter.

    What exactly is it supposed to showcase? That he is faster than the older JMM at a weight that JMM is sluggish? That he can take a punch of a 135 pounder?

    He does not even need to do the fightt and I already know those! It just makes his resume look badder.
     
  4. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010

    You have to take into account the experience of some of these fighters too. Martinez only had 16 bouts at that time. Taking into account his lack of experience, this was not tougher opposition than Baldomir. DLH and Williams is another somewhat debatable one, for similar reasons. The others I agree with.
     
  5. nuketurnal

    nuketurnal N-Bomb Full Member

    2,090
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    Interesting.. I was thinking if marg fought odlh too, and lost.
     
  6. ajlc15

    ajlc15 New Member Full Member

    76
    0
    May 31, 2010
    Don't you get it? OMG...the thread title CLEARLY does not imply who fought the more difficult fight, mayweather or margarito:patsch...INSTEAD which opponent is better quality: 2010 welter pacquiao or 2009 welter marquez.

    LOL, GTFO....That's the same as saying if mayweather FOUGHT/DEFEATED pacquiao instead of ever fighting Marquez, his STATUS as an all-time great would either remain the same or would slightly be low:patsch You are either a Mayweather hater or a *******
     
  7. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010

    I thought JMM asked him...not the other way around. It would showcase his skill after a two year layoff, and give JMM an opportunity to showcase his ability to perform at WW. Who knew he would be "sluggish" at the weight? JMM could've chosen from any of the other 147 lbers, as well. But, this choice made money...so it made sense.

    So, now Floyd takes ALL the blame, for JMM not being able to compete with him? If Manny could go up and fight a 147 lb man, and Oscar fight someone Pac's size, why is it wrong for JMM to move up and try to do the same, and for Floyd to accept that challenge?
     
  8. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    This content is protected
     
  9. ajlc15

    ajlc15 New Member Full Member

    76
    0
    May 31, 2010
    I agree, MArtinez 2010 would annihilate any version of marg. He was inexperienced at 16-0, but the fact that he managed to win around 25 consecutive fights after the marg fight, while Baldomir lost 3 with his next 6 after floyd fight, is a testament that Martinez is in the superior condition between the two. I'm sure that floyd would also beat the 16-0 martinez, but that's not what we are arguing. We are comparing martinez and baldomir.

    The 2007 DLH is clearly not in his prime. I doubt that there are any serious boxing fan who thinks that a 27 years old and at 33-0 paul williams was in his inexperienced form. He is younger taller, bigger, stronger, faster, etc. than the 2007 DLH.
     
  10. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    EXACTLY!! everyone was calling mayweather to fight baldomir when he signed for judah. they where like ''why dont you fight baldomir?'' everyone considered him a great opponent until mayweather schooled him to death then he was just a nobody! do people out there honestly think mayweather doubts, or has ever doubted himself, against margarito or cotto?

    people have called mayweather to fight...

    cotto
    margarito
    paul williams
    mosley
    hatton


    ... he fought and schooled 2 of them, then people say they where overrated or old so thats why he won! as for the other 3, they have all recently lost popularity and so people dont wanna see floyd in with them now. instead, MARTINEZ seems to be flavour of the month so now people wanna see floyd fight him (providing pac doesnt come off).

    even if floyd beats martinez, people will say ''he was never a great champion anyway. fight berto you coward!''. OR, even if he fights and beats pacquiao, people will say ''pac would have ****ed him up 2 years ago. hes 32 now and isnt the same pacquiao!''.

    this may sound over the top to you, but you know its the truth!! Floyd will continue to get **** on forever and ever!! his arrogance doesnt help him, but theres no denying, whatever way you try and twist it, floyd mayweather is one of the greatest champions of the last decade!!! :deal
     
  11. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    Pure 100% dribble! :verysad
     
  12. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    True...but, he was not smarter. And he doesn't really use his physical advantages, as he should...a sign of inexperience. I'm not saying the 2007 ODLH was a monster. He was not prime. But, I'm just saying the disparity between the two, at that particular time, may not be as great as some would like to think.
     
  13. ajlc15

    ajlc15 New Member Full Member

    76
    0
    May 31, 2010
    Yeah you have a point. But DLH's also had the same advantage over pac plus reach and height. I think you could have had a slightly stronger case if it was 2007 DLH vs the 2010 pwill who looked the most vulnerable. But think about this way: Which would look better in Mayweather's resume: a win on a 2007 ODLH or the alternative of a 2007 win against a 33-0 P-will. I'm sure that mayweather could have beaten that version of p-will. What I'm saying is that mayweather NEEDS a "pacquiao" like fighter in his resume. He seriously needs it. Look at ODLH, he has his Chavez. Mayweather's Chavez of this era is no doubt pacquiao. If he retires now he will get rated lower.....