The article isn't even accurate... It says that only Mosley's camp said a substance was found. False. http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/1/25/735983/wrap-controversy-casts-clo 'Dean Lohuis, executive director of the CSAC, said a "plaster-like substance" was discovered under the wraps on both hands.'
And yet I never knew! And I've been on the Express for 2 years. Keep doing your thing Geoff....I mean Rumi.
They've been talking about it on sportscenter, Dan Rafael gave an update and Kermit Cintron's people are suspuscious. Don't know exactly what's going on with Cintron but he is following the story very closely according to ESPN.
You missed my "Why Mosley will beat Margarito" piece? :| That was the first big fight prediction I was right about in months! :rofl:rofl:rofl
he's guilty i'm sure these mexican fans can't seem to get it through there heads, the point is what he had, what richardson said that he had did not belong there it does not belong under any boxers hand wraps, are you calling richarson a lier do you have proof he's a lier did he take a lie detecter test and failed no he didn't, so from this point i believe more richardson than margarito.
I don't have proof just using common sense. Why would potentially he cheat against Mosley who was considered to be a huge underdog, but play fair against Cotto in which HE was going to be the underdog.
But of course he is! If it IS somehow proven that Margo has a history of cheating (easy Zakman, I'm just saying what IF), then his image potentially has a lot to gain, at least as he sees it.
That's exactly what every past opponent of Marg's should be doing. If proven to be a cheater this time, I think his whole career is tainted. No one should give cheaters the benefit of doubt.
So even though Marg's trainer said it was hard guaze prepared two weeks in advance its not enough proof? Why are they preparing guaze two weeks in advance? And if its hard why are the putting it in Marg's wraps?