Margarito vindicated.

This content is protected

 

that had nothing to do with margarito, who is a cheating ****. last night was fought between two warriors, one of whom is an all time great fighter, the other who vindicated himself with an all time great heart. margarito doesn't deserved to be mentioned in the same sentence as either

 

There is no evidence that Margarito ever used plaster in a fight. No evidence whatsoever! Innocent until proven guilty!


Regards,

OJ Simpson

This content is protected

 

well i called pac an all time great cause he is. but you're right, i could say a natural feather came up and beat on a natural welter. just like margo did. but the point is still the same, it has nothing to do with margo. last night was about cotto and pac and says nothing about margarito. at all

 

by the way, what is a nut goggler?:huh is that some kind of regional term?

 

you raise a good point about proof. there's no proof margo cheated against cotto but last night certainly didn't proof he didn't cheat against cotto. we still don't know. and let's be honest, no one doubted what margo did until the mosley fight. people on the forum did take cotto's facial appearance as "evidence" (which is spurious at best) but the fact is Margarito DID try to cheat against mosley. it was reasonable to think he may have done the same against cotto. but honestly, most of us thought until the mosley fight that margarito was just a ****ing badass. no one doubted what he did until bricks started falling out of his gloves

 

this is true. cotto lost and we have no proof otherwise. but there after the mosley fight, it is a reasonable QUESTION to ask. I won't accuse him of cheating against cotto but i will question it

 

unfortunately, boxing fans and others have rushed to judgment with respect to Margarito. There has never been any solid evidence that he had anything in his gloves in any fight besides the Mosley one. None whatsoever.

 

True, but the fact that he was caught trying to cheat, makes him a cheater nonetheless. Whether he used it against Cotto or not, he was caught trying to cheat against another fighter. You can not blame others for thinking the he might have been cheating this way through his entire career. Therefore still making him a cheater.

My question has always been the same though, "How significant was the plaster?" If he was using it before, how did a few fighters manage to beat him? Was it for damage advantage or to protect his own knuckles. Everyone can say, it makes your fist harder , but your fist is already hard (especially for a boxer) once you clench them, unless you're really a big fat ass. Between the skin of the gloves and the fist or plaster in this matter, are paddings to soften up a bit. It's not like the plaster was placed outside the skin of the gloves. You may call me an idiot, but it is something unexplained unless someone shows me a scientific explanation. And no, don't try it on me! How hard was the plaster, how much of it was there?

 

This content is protected