Margarito's opponents

That's exactly what I thought too. Gotta be considered fishy if he's found guilty - even given Cotto's propensity to get cut. His face was a real mess.

 

I think what he meant is that it hasn't even been proven that he indeed had plaster on his wraps, let alone for any previous fight.

 

oh my ****in god. end thread NOW and ban.

 

if there wasnt any proof or evidence, ten you dont call a hearing!! MARGARITO IS DONE...FACE THE FACTS!!

 

Hey bladerunner....the girl in your avatar looks familiar...her name wouldn't

be " Trixy " by any chance would it?

 

A lot of wild presumptions here. I hope some of you don't get asked to do jury service.

 

This is ****ing stupid!

We don't know anything for sure! That is pure specualtion.

This was done in California, under the relatively relaxed standards of the California Commission. Cotto fought him in Nevada. While it is obviously something that can be questioned, based on the loss of credibilioty for Margarito and his camp, it is senseless to say that we know it for sure.

Different state. Different Commission. Period. :bart

 

Not when the NSAC already cleared Margo of any wrongdoing...you can go for an appeal. But it would be hard to make a case without ANY sort of evidence.

It's too bad. If Margo is found guilty, he may never box again and Cotto may never be able to avenge that only loss. It'll always be up to his fans and other boxing spectators to state his case as to where that loss came from...this whole situation is a HUGE ****in' mess :verysad