https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ih5XSCqmqCk Nice interview. Starling kept a pretty low profile after retirement so this is the first interview I've seen of his since he retired. I was a big fan of Starling. He was one of the top welterweights from about 1982 onward. He lost to a prime Curry but had a penchant for beating undefeated up and comers which kept him high in the ratings after the Curry losses. But, he had a couple of bad losses prior to winning the Championship. He was decisioned by Pedro Villela who was not a very good fighter. Then, he lost a technical decision to a shot Johnny Bumphus. Bumphus was cut by a head butt and they were using an experimental system where the scores were announced after each round. Lou Duva thus knew Bumphus was ahead and lobbied for the fight to be stopped and it was, with Bumphus getting a Technical Decision. This was in mid 1986. At that point, Marlon was saddled with four losses and was close to being out of the top 10. He was forgotten. The media was hyping Honeyghan and Mark Breland and everyone thought those two would fight. Breland was very well guided and won the vacant WBA title, which had been stripped of Honeyghan, by beating the mediocre Harold Volbrecht. Honeyghan still held the IBF and WBC titles which he lost on a technical decision to Jorge Vaca, then ko'd Vaca to get the titles back. Vaca has to be one of the worst World Titlists ever, but I digress. Then, Starling caught a huge break. Breland was set to make his first defense against number one contender Tommy Ayers, but Ayres lost a non title fight to Rollin Williams. A replacement was needed to fight Breland and Starling got the shot. If he lost to Breland, that would have been it for his World title aspirations. I knew Starling was a very good challenger and had some tough breaks along the way. He was much better than his record indicated. I also knew Breland hadn't fought very tough competition up to this point. Starling had fought much better opposition. I had a feeling Starling could win. As the fight approached I looked forward to it with anticipation. It would be broadcast on ABC Wide World of Sports. I was 18, a month away from going away to College and my parents wanted to hava a quick trip to the Beach so we could all be together before I went off to College. It happened to coincide with the date of the Starling/Breland fight. We would be at a campground in a pop up trailer, and would not have a TV with us. I tried to talk them into going alone, but they wouldn't do it. So, I missed the fight. That night I tuned in my old AM/FM radio to any AM station I could find. At night near the beach, you could pick up stations from relatively far away. I listened intently for any information on the result of the Breland/Starling fight. Finally, a news reader came on and said something like "Marlon Starling upset the plans of undefeated Olympic champion Mark Breland.'' I was elated. That title shot saved Marlon's career and he went on to beat Honeyghan and get a couple of big paydays like the Nunn fight. Then he quit at the right time, right after losing his WBC title in a close decision to Maurice Blocker. Gladly, he never became a steppingstone for young fighters to pad their records.
Starling was a very good fighter. he beat honeyghan on the night of my 16th birthday which really pi$sed me off at the time as I was a big fan of LLOYD .starling is forgotten by most fans but could give any fighter around his weight in history a very bad night.
If he had taken Curry more seriously the first time, maybe his career would've ended up even better. Damn good fighter, used to follow his career since he was just up the road from me.
Nice story. I remember flipping channels on the radio a few times looking for info on some of the bigger fights. This was before there was much sports talk radio, and certainly not round-the-clock sports stations.
Moochie was damn good. Great defensive fighter with a good chin. Would LOVE to see him in today's era.
I liked Mooch, really good fighter. Could be infuriating with his tendency to clown and mug away fights.
I always thought he was a Juan Laporte of sorts. He'd get the guy to make mistakes and create the openings he wanted. And then would flat out refuse to let his hands go. For a counterpuncher, that window they create is thier opportunity to capitalize on. It's what they do. So often, Starling would have a guy just where he wanted him and just would not capitalize on it. Just like Laporte used to do when he'd lose fights. Starling did better and would win or draw more, but what he did not do was get the A+ result when it was there to be had. Not the easiest guy to train either.
Wow! Marlon Starling. I always liked watching him fight, too. Very nice to see him. I was worried because he basically disappeared after he left the ring. But he looks and sounds good. His interviews are just as confusing now as they were then. I hope we get to see more of him in the coming years. I'd like to see boxing get back to inviting ex-fighters to matches and bringing them up to the ring and introducing them before the main events. Most ex-fighters don't have the tools or the skill to be a commentator. But it would be nice to include them in big events. Starling's a good guy. He'd be one of the first I'd invite up to take a bow.
One of my favorite fighters from that era. Loves watching the breland fights and the personal rivalry that surrounded those bouts. It was fun watching him take apart Lloyd honeyghan too. The Molinares fight had a bizzare outcome. Marlon was dominating that fight before molinares landed a punch after the bell. It was initially ruled as a win for the columbian but I think changed to a no contest.. At any rate starling was great.