Marlon Starling SD12 Simon Brown

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flea Man, Mar 3, 2013.


  1. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Who deserved to take it? What do you think of Brown at this stage of his career, using his boxing ability rather than just hunting for the K.O? And where does this rank in Moochy's list of scalps?

    [yt]Z3yPBKfP-pQ[/yt]
     
  2. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Flea...Thanks alot for the upload! One of those fights that I've always wanted to see...but it kind of fell through the cracks. Good fight. Starling was impressive...scored the fight 9-3 in favor of Moochie.
    Been awhile since I've looked at that era of fighters...Have to say Moochie would have given Mosely more than he wanted...from what we were talking about in the other thread.
    Cheers man!
     
  3. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    Thanks Flea, hadn't seen this one before. I had it 8-3-1 for Starling. I don't think Brown boxed as much as he just tried to throw the necessary punches to keep Starling off him. He just looked a bit in over his head.

    Fights like this aren't a bad way to gert a tough education, if you're Brown.......being Starling, he isn't likely to put TOO big a physical beating on you, and everybody knew he was smart and savvy, so Brown's handlers probably felt okay about throwing their guy in with Moochie then. He may very well lose, but Starling would most likely let him last a while, maybe win a round or two and then figure him out. Not too damaging a loss either physically or mentally. That wouldn't be too difficult to recover from.
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Nice posh Sal' and I agree; crazy to think it, but Brown is being pretty negative here.

    Unlikely he'd have more than a punchers chance, and a slim one at that, against Starling anyway.
     
  5. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    Starling won the fight pretty cleanly.

    8-4 or thereabouts.
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    And it's significance as a victory for The Magic Man? Do you agree with my previous statement that after Leonard and Curry he was the 3rd best welter of the 80s, taking into account accomplishments for that decade only?
     
  7. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    It's a very good win obviously and one of Starling's best.

    What about Hearns?






    This content is protected
     
  8. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    I watched this about a year ago. Had it 8-4ish for Starling. Don't think it was close enough to warrant the split decision. Based strictly on accomplishments, yeah I could buy the argument of him being 3rd best welter of the 80's.
    Although I felt Brown was a little green in this fight, I still rate it. I'd put it in the same realm as Starlings wins over Honeyghan and Breland. I think Starling's best showings were the close losses to Curry. I felt he could've gotten the first one had he been a little more busy.
     
  9. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    Agreed. I thought the first Curry fight was very winnable for him, but his own inexperience showed there. He should have put the pedal down a bit more.

    As an overall accomplishment, I have to rank this one below Honeyghan simply because of the green-ness factor. Brown was a better career fighter than Honeyghan, whom I think is all kinds of overrated, but he was still The Man in the welterweight division when Starling smacked him down.

    Aside from Leonard, Hearns, and Curry, I'd call him the third best welter of the decade. That's fair.
     
  10. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    Yeah, you're right about Honeyghan. I'm guilty of revisionist history, which I hate, regarding that fight. I don't recall, but I'd expect Honeyghan was a favorite going in to his fight with Starling.
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    This is fair, does Hearns have more in the 80s than I remember?
     
  12. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    Heheheheheh.............I just noticed my math there. Nice work Sal. "Except for these three guys he's the third best." Dumbass. :lol:
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Hey, I can live with 4th best if Tommy has more to his 147lb record in that decade, I can't be arsed to check dates :D
     
  14. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    Flea brings up a good point; it's very arguable as to whether Hearns should be considered better than Starling at 147, based on longevity and accomplishment. He did (rather emphatically) dethrone a longtime champion in Cuevas, stopped the always tricky and high-quality Shields (albeit on cuts I think, haven't seen it), and then put in a magnificent effort that only an ATG like Leonard could have overcome in the unification fight.

    I guess based on that, I'd still want to say Hearns made more of a mark. Moochie was around longer, but his was more of a low-grade fever compared to Hearns.........
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Tommy of course beat a titlist, not the lineal champ'.

    Starling did ;)

    I can see Starling getting no look in here, but I can honestly see both sides of the coin.

    A shot one-eyed Muangsurin arguably trumps any victory ever recorded though :yep :deal