Marlon Starling vs Pernell Whitaker

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Jay1990, Jul 28, 2018.


  1. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Not a shock here. I bet you picked Haugen, Ramirez and Nelson to beat Pea as well.
     
  2. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,973
    19,008
    Oct 4, 2016
    Sweet pea, could be closer than you think though
     
  3. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004

    Those guys weren't as skilled as Starling. Marlon would get the job done.
     
  4. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,579
    29,115
    Oct 12, 2010
    Surprised to see a lot of people picking Whitaker. Starling would have the size advantage, plus he had faster hand speed, more power, and the boxing ability to really trouble Whitaker. Starling was also a very good counter puncher and in-fighter as well. People forget just how good Starling was when he was on form. A sharp Starling would have beaten Whitaker convincingly IMO.
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2018
  5. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,704
    4,451
    Jul 14, 2009