Marlon Starling vs Shane Mosley

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Xplosive, Jan 15, 2009.


  1. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,031
    18,306
    Jul 29, 2004
    Why do people even take notice of redrooster and reply to him if he is so offensive?

    The General forum has taught me "Just don't look, Just don't look" is the best method.
     
  2. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    There isn't one active fighter who gets adequately judged on the classic forum.
     
  3. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,031
    18,306
    Jul 29, 2004
    Is that your way of saying Mosley beats Starling?
     
  4. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    He's mastered the fine art of interweb trolling of course. :happy:lol:
     
  5. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005

    okay but Shane is good you got to admit it
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,857
    44,573
    Apr 27, 2005
    Many of us choose to. For reasons :lol:
     
  7. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Rooster's just a pest who has crazy opinions. A laughable character. If anyone finds his posts offensive, god help them.
     
  8. Brummy1976

    Brummy1976 Guest

    :good
     
  9. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    The first fight was the Split Decision. Curry moved a bit too much in the later rounds while dropping his out-put, allowing Starling to make a better showing of himself. In the rematch (which was the better fight) Curry took control from the get-go, though Starling held his own and had his moments.
     
  10. Sonny Carson

    Sonny Carson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,995
    5
    Jan 7, 2007
    Another thing about Starling was his hands were really fast. He matched Curry's hand speed in the beginning of the second fight. He just didn't let his hands go all of the time. Shane was great but I don't see him beating Starling. I do think Shane could beat Honeyghen though.
     
  11. Waynegrade

    Waynegrade Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,684
    29
    Jul 27, 2008
    This is a good match! Shane is a good boxer with great speed. But, Starling was a good boxer as well with great defense and some decent pop in his punch. Shane can get frustrated with certain foes, interesting to see how he deals with the `Magic Man`. I have to think about this one...
     
  12. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    Starling was a horrible fight for anyone and is underatted.He beat Honeyghan and Breland and would do the same with Mosley.
     
  13. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Shane would get his ass handed to him by Moochie.Moochie takes 9 or 10 out of 12 rounds for an easy decision.
     
  14. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,064
    5,393
    Aug 19, 2010
    I think Starling was definitely more skilled.....MS by UD.
     
  15. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Starling was good,but a little overrated over his win over Breland. He was good, but the elite level like Shane would beat him with speed. Shane should just jab and beat Marlon to the punch and win rounds and win a comfortable decision.