Marlon Starling vs Terry Norris

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Cobra33, Jun 22, 2007.


  1. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Ray Leonard-5 time world champion and strongly favored to win

    John Mugabi-then the current champion favored to win as well

    In both cases the fearless and unlimited talent of Norris upset the odds and the experts with effortless, flawless wins over these two greats. Starling should be greatful he didnt have to face him.
     
  2. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    Yeah ray leonard was so old that only what 2 and a half years before that fight he stopped danny lalonde, went 12 rounds with thomas hearns and yes it was a close fight, not as one sided as every hearns nuthugger tries to imply. Then after he shutout a duran that just beat iran barkley. Wow he was so washed up, lol.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,559
    Apr 27, 2005
    Leonards last topline performance was Hagler. He looked shyte against a Hearns who was declined as well, Lalonde was at a catchweight, not that talented, and gave him hell, and Duran would have got shutout by a Nunn, Leonard or any other top mover. The Benitez that beat him at 154 would have shut him out too the night Leonard did.

    2 1/2 years is a long time, especially when you are already past it, especially at the age Leonard was.
     
  4. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005


    You know Leonard could have beaten any jr middleweight in history the night he lost to Norris except for Hearns, McCallum, Norris, Ayala. Wilfred benitez? He's a pacifist and would have been toast. Leonard was barely off a year and between defenses. He was in the best shape of his life but isnt the caliber of a Terry Norris which I lready knew. Stop making up problems that dont exist.
     
  5. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    its what he does, lol. Just make excuses for leonard, sugar ray got his ass handed to him, norris is just a better athlete than leonard can ever dream of.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,559
    Apr 27, 2005
    Yes, who could be a credible as you :lol:

    Here you are in the general forum 5 minutes ago knocking Spinks for not rematching Eddie and Qawi


    The facts


    Spinks gave Eddie a rematch, Eddie couldn't make the weight and refused to even try after what happened weight wise in their initial encounter.

    Spinks and Qawi were to rematch in September 84, but about 2 weeks before the bout Qawi got injured and pulled out. There was also talk of Qawi suffering from depression from recent personal events.

    :lol:


    This content is protected
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    it must really hurt to lose in this manner when a man coming off a 3 year layoff, never having fought at middleweight upsets the 3-1 odds only to lose the way he did to another 3-1 underdog when Leonard had all the advantages.

    If they can brag about the win over Hagler how much more do we have a right to claim the superiority of Norris?
     
  8. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,834
    608
    Jul 11, 2006
    terry norris by a big, wide as a trick decision

    terry is too active against a peek a boo style. this is why i would vouch for terry to beat winky easily. and give mcallum problems.
     
  9. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Exactly, and Keith Mullings just has better boxing skill than Terry Norris can ever dream of. We can face the facts JT, why can't you?
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,559
    Apr 27, 2005
    You've got me there SS, dang. Mullins, Rosenblatt and Boudouani did indeed expose Norris to be rather overrated, and durability challnged as well. I guess it's also time to face the fact Tarver and Johnson too were just better fighters than Roy Jones Jr ever was too. Prime Jones knocked comatose by the lethal fists of immortals Tarver and the Road Warrior.
     
  11. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Good to see that you've come to your senses. And Terry and Roy woud have been heavy favourites against most of those fighters when they lost, which of course is definitive proof of Roy and Terry being prime :good
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,559
    Apr 27, 2005
    Terry would have beaten any JMiddle ever excepting Julian Jackon, Mullins, Rosenblatt and Boudouani the night he lost to the latter 3! Oh and first fight Simon Brown! That's as long as he kept his weird fetish for hitting fighters while they were down in check.
     
  13. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    :yep

    Quite simply he was unbeatable - except when he lost!
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,559
    Apr 27, 2005
    We're definitely on the same line :yep

    Quite simply everytime he ever lost he was absolutely, totally, unequivocally peak!
     
  15. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Birth of an idiot: John Thomas