Marquez and Malignaggi had it a draw for Cotto...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Blackness, Dec 3, 2012.


  1. strongarm

    strongarm Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,681
    3
    Dec 5, 2008

    **** no. That fight was not close enough to be a draw. That is bull****. If anything, people were biased that night, because it was Miguel Cotto getting his ass beat.

    Trout won at least 7 rounds without a doubt. 9 rounds to 3 in my scorecard - for trout.

    Didn't Brian Kenny have it 9 rounds to 3 as well?
     
  2. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    a draw? hahaha um no

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  3. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    I had it 9-3. I was really worried the judges were going to be like Malinaggi. Seriously, Paulie is a darn good analyst but he was off on this fight. Maybe because he lost to Cotto and wanted a possible fight with Cotto in NY? Farhood for Showtime is like Lederman for HBO. They both usually have the pulse of the fight.
     
  4. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    He just looks like a whiner! He's about to cry again. SOB SOB.
     
  5. blacktopbully

    blacktopbully Boxing Addict banned

    4,703
    1
    May 2, 2011
    head butts will do that
     
  6. raichu

    raichu Guest

    cause of the damage cotto done to paulie, paulie goes on like cotto is one of the goat.
     
  7. Ianian58

    Ianian58 Active Member Full Member

    680
    2
    Oct 16, 2012
    7-5

    8-4

    Either works. It was closer than people say. But the rounds Trout won were very clear.