Marquez at #1 P4P is debatable but there is no reason for him to be behind Calzaghe!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RafaelGonzal, Sep 16, 2008.


Page 2 of 9
  1. jaco

    jaco Thomas Hearns Full Member

    2,000
    1
    Sep 16, 2007
    I have him at #2.
     
    jaco, Sep 16, 2008
    jaco, Sep 16, 2008
    #16
  2. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Same here . . . he is my #2 man.
     
    psychopath, Sep 16, 2008
    psychopath, Sep 16, 2008
    #17
  3. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    :rofl
     
    CASH_718, Sep 16, 2008
    CASH_718, Sep 16, 2008
    #18
  4. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    same here. but he could be no.1 depending on the result of pac-dlh fight on dec (what i mean is the manner of beating, coz we all know that pac will lose)
     
    dhenzrae, Sep 17, 2008
    dhenzrae, Sep 17, 2008
    #19
  5. TheH1tMan

    TheH1tMan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    Riiight... Rafael Gonzalez.....

    Couldn't you at least have picked a name such as "Suge White", "Big Black Daddy" or "Canadian Trucker" like others have done to not make it so obvious that 90% on ESB have latino roots?
     
    TheH1tMan, Sep 17, 2008
    TheH1tMan, Sep 17, 2008
    #20
  6. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,844
    12
    Mar 7, 2006
    thats two old fighters vs 1 for Calzaghe in a fight he arguably lost and looked like ****. Kessler is the only young guy he beat and kessler is not head and shoulders above CasaMayor or Mab. Add to that the very close fights with Pac the consensus P4P #1. I would like to know who you have at 1 and 2
     
    RafaelGonzal, Sep 17, 2008
    RafaelGonzal, Sep 17, 2008
    #21
  7. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,844
    12
    Mar 7, 2006
    would you prefer Chauncy Billups or maybe Felipe Stargell. I didnt know I needed to hide my ethninity on here, does that make my posts any less relevant. I have no problem and hell I wish I could change my ESB moniker to RAF is it possible? anyway I dont think it matters but I wanted to shorten it to Raf though I dont give a rats ass if people know Im latin or not. I didnt think it was a big deal. I do have the capacity to root for non latins Pac and Pavlik Abraham, Dawson so what is youre problem? Im also Puerto Rican and reserve the right to root for every Boricua that comes down the pipe.

    I will however not root for a Boricua who is a ducker or cherry picker or does the kind of bull**** Delahoys does in that case I would root for the other guy. So whats youre real problem with my moniker?
     
    RafaelGonzal, Sep 17, 2008
    RafaelGonzal, Sep 17, 2008
    #22
  8. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,289
    19
    Sep 21, 2006
    I agree, JMM at 2

    and Calzaghe wont be able to get that #2 spot back unless he TKOs RJJ
     
    Boom_Boom, Sep 17, 2008
    Boom_Boom, Sep 17, 2008
    #23
  9. TheH1tMan

    TheH1tMan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    0
    Jun 23, 2008

    I don't have a problem with you dude - nor do I have a problem with the fighters you like.

    However, I have a problem with the couple of posters that haven't understood what the polls on ESB show - namely where the posters come from.

    A poll that asks: "Who is p4p no. 2 Calzaghe or Marquez?" is really saying "Are there more latinos or brits on ESB?".

    And so on. Polls on ESB basically only show the 'truth' when the 'truth' is too obvious - in which case a poll is of little use anyway. And when the 'truth' is somewhat debatable the polls will be answered by "Are there more x or y members on ESB? In which case it of course is also useless.
     
    TheH1tMan, Sep 17, 2008
    TheH1tMan, Sep 17, 2008
    #24
  10. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    I would place Marquez at 1 now.

    Marquez
    Calzaghe
    Pac
     
    TFFP, Sep 17, 2008
    TFFP, Sep 17, 2008
    #25
  11. Broxi

    Broxi Stand With Ukraine Full Member

    5,431
    312
    Oct 14, 2007
    Regardless, he lost and you're wrong. Hopkins was a fairly effective counter puncher in the first 3-4 rounds but after that the tide turned way in Calzaghes favour.
     
    Broxi, Sep 17, 2008
    Broxi, Sep 17, 2008
    #26
  12. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    He didn't lose to any of them, certainly not Pacquiao. Poor judging for the marketable fighter.
     
    TFFP, Sep 17, 2008
    TFFP, Sep 17, 2008
    #27
  13. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    First off most people think JMM was robbed vs John. Second John has been an undefeated champion for many years. I doubt a C+ fighter does that.
     
    CASH_718, Sep 17, 2008
    CASH_718, Sep 17, 2008
    #28
  14. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    You have no clue how to score pro fights to even say that. Get real.
     
    san rafael, Sep 17, 2008
    san rafael, Sep 17, 2008
    #29
  15. batang kanto

    batang kanto ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    1,974
    4
    Jun 4, 2008
    that list by tffp just shows how "good boxing analysts" are always out of place.
     
    batang kanto, Sep 17, 2008
    batang kanto, Sep 17, 2008
    #30
Page 2 of 9