Marquez beats Pacquiao TWICE !

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by yesihavearm2, Dec 15, 2008.


  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006

    Wow, so I wasn't seeing things. I knew I had JMM winning more rounds than Pac in both fights.
     
  2. s1nn3d

    s1nn3d Sinner Full Member

    767
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    Please, read post #57 and #60. ;)
     
  3. wansen

    wansen Guest

    I, for one, had JMM clearly winning the first and a razor-thin win in the second.
     
  4. fastfist

    fastfist Active Member Full Member

    572
    0
    Jul 6, 2008
    This thread is worth considering if Marquez clearly dominated Pac or was much more superior. It was so close a fight that determining the winner is like tossing a coin. Marquez just got the wrong side of the coin. 20 years from now when people will talk about these 2 fights I'm sure it will be the KDs that will have much more weight in the discussions because those are easier to remember.
     
  5. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    I thought the Marquez won both fights but they were so close its not right to say either fighter was robbed or was unfairly treated.
     
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I agree.
     
  7. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Those KDs were crucial to give Pac the nod from the judges. Both fights were too close to call. I like to see at 3rd fight at 140. Probably in May 2010 if Marquez is still around.
     
  8. MancMexican

    MancMexican Blood & Guts Forever Full Member

    5,152
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    regardless of who so called experts think won, when most of your sources think marquez won 114-113, eeking out a victory by a single point is not taking anyone to school
     
  9. coupdegrace

    coupdegrace Active Member Full Member

    966
    0
    Dec 5, 2008

    fcuk compubox! cannot do the task right, well if jmm really landed 130 power punch how come none of them droppd pac? the judges gave the nod to pac bcoz he is the aggressor he made the match a war aside to the fact that he floored jmm again, in a very close match like this judges tend to favor the initiator a bit, though imo it should be a clear ud. guess if the 3 judges ruled it ud for pac none of this bs argument existed. well thats boxing industry, thats the beauty of this sport outcome first and then here comes the spice.
     
  10. jjax

    jjax Active Member Full Member

    1,432
    0
    Jan 12, 2008
    What's the point of arguing this over and over? The casual fan and the Pac fan will give him wins since they don't know any better. Ask legitimate boxing experts and historians, and they give both fights to Marquez.

    It's a done deal, I don't see the controversy. JMM>Pac at 130lbs and below. At 140 Pac would win.
     
  11. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    :blood
     
  12. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    But not enough to change the official results. This issue is too old already. Marquez had conceded defeat by desperately asking for rematch.

    JMM nutsniffers, give it a rest. Just look forward for better fights.
     
  13. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    Yes, you have an interesting imagination.
    YOu also said ODHL will demolish PAC :lol::lol::lol: