This thread is worth considering if Marquez clearly dominated Pac or was much more superior. It was so close a fight that determining the winner is like tossing a coin. Marquez just got the wrong side of the coin. 20 years from now when people will talk about these 2 fights I'm sure it will be the KDs that will have much more weight in the discussions because those are easier to remember.
I thought the Marquez won both fights but they were so close its not right to say either fighter was robbed or was unfairly treated.
Those KDs were crucial to give Pac the nod from the judges. Both fights were too close to call. I like to see at 3rd fight at 140. Probably in May 2010 if Marquez is still around.
regardless of who so called experts think won, when most of your sources think marquez won 114-113, eeking out a victory by a single point is not taking anyone to school
fcuk compubox! cannot do the task right, well if jmm really landed 130 power punch how come none of them droppd pac? the judges gave the nod to pac bcoz he is the aggressor he made the match a war aside to the fact that he floored jmm again, in a very close match like this judges tend to favor the initiator a bit, though imo it should be a clear ud. guess if the 3 judges ruled it ud for pac none of this bs argument existed. well thats boxing industry, thats the beauty of this sport outcome first and then here comes the spice.
What's the point of arguing this over and over? The casual fan and the Pac fan will give him wins since they don't know any better. Ask legitimate boxing experts and historians, and they give both fights to Marquez. It's a done deal, I don't see the controversy. JMM>Pac at 130lbs and below. At 140 Pac would win.
But not enough to change the official results. This issue is too old already. Marquez had conceded defeat by desperately asking for rematch. JMM nutsniffers, give it a rest. Just look forward for better fights.