Does this ****** have any common sense? It's nacho's fault telling him in the corner that he is always winning. No wonder he thinks he won against Pacquiao too. Do you juantards think Marquez won against Bradley too?
He got schooled in there. I always knew he was overrated. Aside from Pac, he's beaten NOBODY in his career except an old Barrera, who he struggled with.
He is a very good counter puncher and is Pacquaio's kryptonite, but he has always struggled against movers and at 40yrs of age, its hardly a surprise really
He does well vs Pac but gets beats up in the process and barely scrapes by when he's won. Let's face it, Pac has no problem hitting Marquez. The guy is really overrated because people hate Pac, it's plain and simple. His resume is **** poor beyond Pac. Chris John beat his ass too. If Marquez was the popular fighter, they would say Pac is his kryptonite.
I had it 115-113 Bradley. No robbery. He's successful v Pacquiao for 2 reasons. Pacquiao lunges forward and has peanuts for ring IQ. The fighters JMM struggles with are fighters with good lateral movement and ring generalship.