Marquez Defeating Pacquiao DOES NOT Indicate Pac Loses to Floyd- A Technical Summary

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bogotazo, Nov 13, 2011.


  1. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    No but he stopped your hero in the 12th round:hi::rofl:rofl
     
  2. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    Do you guys have to be such childish ******s ALL THE TIME?

    What are you, 16? Grow up ya ****ing pansy.
     
  3. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    :patsch **** up..i was responding to his avatar ( cotto) who pac stopped since his a great finisher:lol:
     
  4. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    No, a great finisher would have stopped him once he had him hurt, which Cotto was, several times early on. A great finisher wouldn't have to rely on the ref to stop him out of compassion late in the 12th.

    And you were being a childish *****. You know it. :deal
     
  5. pahapoisu

    pahapoisu Superman! Full Member

    7,824
    2
    Jul 5, 2010
    Saw stars and came back to school that mofo.
    He wasnt as wild and it was his best possible performance.
     
  6. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    Word, I appreciate it.

    Thanks a lot!

    :good

    Floyd is great at adapting, but for the most part, his adjustments come by timing the shots and the distance it takes to evade and tag his opponents, almost always from a straight-lined angle. He could (and should) have made his life easier by adapting with greater lateral movement in several fights, and didn't. Against Castillo, he gave up the center of the ring often; against De La Hoya, he was being backed up straight by occasional jabs and somewhat ineffective flurries, and it took him half the fight to start timing enough offense to win the rounds more definitively (and even then he did it by just enough); in the early rounds against Hatton, he was nearly knocked off balance trying to circle out in range; against Judah, he ate left hands set up by weak right-jabs (something people criticize Pac for) all night and was able to adjust and time his shots since Judah mostly stayed still himself and tried to play the timing game (which he lost big in the second half); against Ortiz, after winning every round, he backed up straight into the ropes and ate a couple of shots unnecessarily before the headbutt.

    Floyd is no doubt great, and I'm not saying Pacquiao necessarily wins, but what I'm saying is that these strategically hazardous habits that show up in spots throughout Floyd's recent career reveal a pattern that Pacquiao's attributes can exploit and thus make a competitive fight, and they stem from a style that does not emphasize what gave Marquez his greatest success in their trilogy.
     
  7. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    Floyd and Juan are different, this much we know. However what Juan did is not the reason I think Floyd beats Juan with ease. Pac has yet to show ability to judge distance properly. And when he goes do close the distance he either hops in range or over extends with shots. Pac creates most of the openings himself. What Juan does to Pac isnt complicated at all.

    People forget the reach advantage floyd has over pac, its significant. The reach will allow Floyd to steal shots over the top on pac and Pac wont be able to do much about it. Pac doesnt have a jab and therefor doesnt have anything to close the distance with and not get hit on the way in.

    Tazo I dont feel Floyd stepping back in straight lines sometimes will be a problem becuase pac only changes his punching angles on flat footed stationary targets. Pac attacks in straight lines when the target isnt standing there wanting to trade. What angles did Pac use against Juan?

    He cant cut the ring off which forces him to attack in straight lines. Floyd will hit Pac on the way in and on the way out.

    Pac better hope he can hurt Floyd( because he certainly didnt hurt Juan in November) because if not Floyd will force him to go backwards and once that happens, goodnight.
     
  8. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    Well, there were several times Pacquiao clocked JMM with a left before switching to the right, and though it looks like he's attacking in straight lines, he's often shuffling to stick his foot on the outside and align his left, or moving left to walk his opponents into a left hand unwittingly. Cutting off the ring won't necessarily be a problem because Floyd isn't really a "mover". He's not flat-footed, but he's not really a "mover" either. Besides, if Floyd doesn't move laterally, Pacquiao's best bet is probably to catch him in the center of the ring; he's not a traditional swarmer and trying to wild out on him against the ropes isn't his style, nor is it a good idea IMO. But even if Pac doesn't change the angle, we've seen Mayweather get hit by lefts down the pipe more consistently than any other punch.

    Here, despite the fact Shane is undeniably shot to ****, this one moment of a subtle back-pedal is not dissimilar to the reflexive habits of Mayweather anticipating an offensive. Manny gets his foot on the outside coming in after gauging Shane's movement straight backwards, and fires.

    This content is protected


    Although I had JMM winning clearly, this is one of the few moments Pacquiao was able to time him and then change the angle in his favor. I believe the way Mayweather prefers to move straight back instead of laterally, we'd see more of these moments.

    This content is protected


    In earlier posts I also mentioned how it's actually easier for Pacquiao to weave under a taller man's punches, whereas with a similarly sized Marquez who was ducking under Pacquiao and coming up from below and then over the top, there was no escape in sight. The reach may be a challenge, but if Floyd isn't comfortable using it as he backs up while Pacquiao rushes him, it may not play as big as role as we might have thought. If you look at the blitzing combination Floyd throws at Ortiz in the 4th, while it's effective, it seems to lose some of it's sting as Ortiz does a half-assed bob and weave under it; Pac's even shorter and more elastic. Floyd's lengthy jab is very accurate, but if you're not practically on the complete right of Manny Pacquiao (as Marquez often sets himself up to be) and throw more than one (Floyd prefers single shots), it can be countered by the same counter Pac's been using for years, posted above.



    If Floyd takes control coming forward, it doesn't look good for Manny, but he always has the game-changer in his left hand and I think they'll prepare for the relatively identifiable patterns in Mayweather's controlled and efficient offense.
     
  9. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    You got to be kidding us Tazo. That straight left by Pacquiao was weak. It was simply an arm punch. Thats what Pacquiao was relugated to scoring the whole night against Marquez.
    Anytime Pacquiao tried to punch with authority, he was missing badly.
    That type of an arm punch was the only types of punches Pacquiao was able to land on Marquez, which is why Pacquiao did'nt even as much as stun Marquez the entire fight.

    Symphencyceo is absolutely correct. I had also mentioned it very early in this thread. Mayweather can afford to back up in straight lines against Pacquiao because of his reach advantage.
    Mayweather pulls his head way back and he sticks his left hand out as a guage for incoming as he backs up.
    The Klitchko bros. especiallly Vitali with his size and reach advantage use this defensive manuever to great effect.

    As has been mentioned, Mayweather can change the angle as well, but against Pacquiao, imo he's not going to even have to that much.
    If Mayweather pulls staight back as you expect he will against Pacquiao, there are two keys which why that type of strategy will benefit Mayweather.
    1. His height and reach, I've expressed it with the Klitchko analogy.

    and

    2. Mayweather is so damn quick. He is so much quicker than Pacquiao Tazo its not even funny.

    Imo its not going to be much of a difference maker.
    Mayweather is going to time and tag Pacquiao hard all night long whether he changes the angle or backs up in straight lines.
    Mayweather is so much better technically and fundamentally guaging distance, he can pick and chose whether he pulls straight back or angles off. You can bet he's going to give Pacquiao a taste of both.
     
  10. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    here some visual aid for anyone who needs it:
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    Juan mainly uses his for checking or not allowing emmanuel in. He did it quite a few times in the 3rd fight.

    Floyd likes to use his for checking and measuring. He's great at flicking the jab out to set punches off on and really uses this technique against southpaws.

    Floyd has much longer arms than Juan and will have 3 inches in arm length over emmanuel when he's measuring and checking.
     
  11. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    :lol:

    Marquez fought this Pacquiao without OSDT.

    LMAO at *****s chalking it up as a "W" for Mayweather.

    M'fer is SCARED.


     
  12. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    How the **** do you go from this:



    This content is protected



    To this:


    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected




    When have you ever seen Floyd land a counter like that? In fact that counter combination Marquez threw was more impressive than anything Floyd has ever done. He hit Pacquiao while he was in the air for **** sake.


    I don't see anything in those Floyd gifs that would cause Pac trouble mainly because he's only throwing one punch at time, he's relatively stationary and Pac will jump all over him. As the thread starter has explained so elequently Marquez style is simply a tougher matchup then FLoyd's is. Floyd's defensive habits actually play into Pacquiao's hands.

    He does have a reach advantage but he's so prone to fighting in the pocket that it won't make a big difference. He's not going to deter PAcquiao from coming in either by only throwing one punch , and not taking the risk of letting his hands go in the moments where he'll need to. He's goes stationary on defense too and that will give Pacquiao all the confidence and opportunity he needs to land punches.
     
  13. Kevin Jesus

    Kevin Jesus Active Member Full Member

    1,330
    5
    Dec 16, 2009
    Pacquiao would have the disadvantage in height, reach, skills like defense, counterpunching...all of this, against a boxer type, not a fighter. Floyd can basically shut Pacquiao out like if he is a Klitschko, just pot shot to a boring decision, and Manny can't do anything about it. Floyd can also fight Manny toe to toe if he wanted to, and still win. Manny only has one way to fight Floyd, and that's fight. Can Manny box against Floyd? No he can't. Can he outwork him with 1,000 punches? No he would be luck to even throw 500 against Floyd.

    The thing is, Marquez boxed Pacquiao. That's why he looked so good, he stayed out of harms way and just outboxed Pacquiao. That's exactly what Floyd can do but even better.
     
  14. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    divac broke it down pretty easily and simply with words that go perfectly with the pictures. This has nothing to do with throwing combos. Try to use your brain and understand what he's saying instead of being lazy.
     
  15. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    ^ ok first of all pulling straight back is an error in boxing and its not the right strategy against pacquiao. You want to move to laterally, not straight back. What do you think Floyd is going to do just jab jab, and bounce backward all night? He's going to have to plant his feet at some point, and he cant be moving backwards all time, he's gotta be offensive to. Pacquiao can let him come to him and Floyd tends to be aggressive against lefties anyway. Pac also has great feints which can get Floyd to lock up , and he does fall for them all the time.

    Floyd is habituated to fighting in the pocket, hes not a distance fighter and never has been. His defensive style requires him to plant his feet, it makes him more of a pocket fighter, ala James Toney. I've never seen Floyd fight the type of fight that would best nullify pacquiao's style, the way Marquez does.