Marquez: Everyone knows I won all three fights against Pacquiao

I had the first fight a draw. I gave the 2nd fight to Manny 6-6 with the KD gave him the 1 point victory.

3rd fight I gave to Marquez by a wide margin 8-4.

 

This is pugi nani stupid ass...the mutha fuka made up a name cuz I was gettin him so bad in my thread. He got all mad and made a new name up..

Hi Pugi dumb ****:hi: Tired of being knocked in my thread so your ****** ass made a new name:rofl

You a loser bro-you really took time out of your day or night to make a new name, becasue someone was bashing you in a forum.roflatsch

 

your pugi you ****in dummy.

WOW...IM SORRY FOR PICKING ON YOU PUGI...I DIDN'T REALIZE HOW BAD YOUR LIFE WAS.:rofl

EVERYONE CHECK THIS GUY'S FIRST POST...IT'S IN MY THREAD AFTER I WAS PICKING ON PUGI:rofl:rofl

WOW, ESB IS REALLY YOUR LIFE PUGI:rofl

 

Nahhh. . . I thought Pacquiao won the first two fights, and I thought Marquez nicked the third. . . But they were all close enough to be debatable. . . If 'Quez didn't kiss the canvas in the first two fights, he would have won.

 

you muh ****a...your first post came in the middle of me bashing on pugi...your pugi you dummy.

Stop playing stupid ho. I already knocked your real name out so you made this alt..****in idiot.

Even your avatar and details give your ***** ass up:deal

 

yikes

 

feel you, it's boxing, **** happens, all we can do is move on

stay up pimp

 

I never scored the first fight but a draw seemed fair, I did however give Marquez the second fight 7-4-1 & the third fight 9-2-1... he won those two fight IMO, bull**** decisions.

 

The first one is Pacquiao for certain. I've seen that fight analyzed to death and when you really score it it always comes out Pacquiao, its close and its clear.

You can't argue Pacquiao was up by five points after two rounds. Marquez talks straight out his ******* too, likes to spread horse****. "I dominated after the first round" because he saw the internet myth created and he pumped it up. He didn't win the second round. There were other rounds he lost too, although he clearly won the most rounds after the first two by far, he did not overcome a five point deficit in the ten rounds left. He did not win the next ten rounds eight to two.

 

By my cards, Marquez didn't win any of the three fights. Even those who did score to him can't have done so by much, he failed to be a decisive winner vs Pac across three fights. Can three different sets of judges all have been wrong? He never does enough vs Manny, he gets outworked.

I'd still like to see a fourth fight though, I love watching these two guys fight each other!

 

Bull****, Marquez won those last 2 fights... because he isn`t beating pac from pillar to post for 12 rounds doesn`t mean he never won the fight, he won more rounds & he was denied glory, especially in that 3rd fight because of the money/star power factor that pac has over JMM.

Its real poor **** to do a round by round score on all of those fights & not have JMM a winner in any of them.

JMO :good

 

Talking shite there mate. :good

1st fight was a clear Pac win, 2nd one I had a draw on the basis that I had a round 10-10 that most people seem to have given to Pacquiao, last fight was the same. Marquez had great rounds in all three fights, but a great round is 10-9 the same as a competitive round is 10-9 due to the scoring system. He didn't decisively win any of them, hence the three verdicts!

 

you're a ****ing disgrace.

 

My scoring.

First fight - Pacquiao
Second fight - Pacquiao
Third fight - Marquez

All three fights are definitely close.