Marquez face more bruised than Pacquiao's

The face does not lie. Think about it... when Pac fought Marquez in the other fights, clearly you could see a lot of ware and tare, right? This is what you expect of someone who is actually beat, right? But this fight, magically Pacmans face is unharmed, and he only got a cut due to a cheap headbutt by Marquez. Marquez punches did no damage... and pacman landed a lot more than people give him credit. But everyone has an agenda and every idiot has an opinion.

The only reason people think Pacman loss, is because they were expecting too much from him. They were expecting a KO but they got a close fight. so naturally people looking at it like this, will go for the underdog, confusing the actual reality of the fight, which the faces show clearly. Pacman bruises easily, look what Clottely did to his face and he barely landed a punch! Pacman doesnt have the same intensity, that's all. He outboxed Marquez this fight. Yes Marquez had his moments, but it wasnt enough. if you are trying to win the championship, you gotta take more chances! Close rounds should always go to the champion... its like a untold role. and you have to admit there were a LOT of close rounds. so the score cards were right on target as far as im concerned. Pacman is just the better fighter, even though he is well past his best, but still solid.

 

3500 posts in 4 months.Get a life and stop crying you dumb ****en *******.