Betting odds has nothing to do with how a fighter won or lost his last fight. It has everything to do with where the money is being bet. Lots of people are betting against PAC because he lost a fight based on judging. If you are betting because a boxer lost one fight, you shouldn't be betting at all. +300 for Marquez is a fantastic bet based on the return value. Betting on paquiao with his lousy odds is a terrible bet. The good bet where you would make the most money is a draw. Of course this is like hitting a snake eyes, boxcars or ace deuce in craps.
True. Public money will be going on pac as hes the fan favourite. For the odds to move this way big moneys going down on jmm
I won near £100 on that fight too and got betfair slip to prove it, dont mean Bradley won. I was in absolute shock when the results were read, and so was 90% of public watching both on TV and live.
Some of you guys are on the money others are just hoping this doesn't hurt your weak Pac bets. Betting on Pac is at least 500 dollars investment if not why bet. I got 1g on Marquez!!!
i know what you mean, i,m a betting man and it takes alot of money to move it that far. something going on and only the big guns move it that far. but im a pac fan and he looks good for the fight so we will see.
Yeah, because experts are never wrong. How many guys with MBAs from Ivy league schools were working at Lehmans when it went bankrupt?
Perplexing post. Anyway, sharps knew what they were betting. They knew Poochiao would taken an Ambien pill. LOL All the squares bet on Poochiao when the line went down. They might've as well have thrown the money out the window.