Marquez is getting sh!t for fighting Morales, why does Cotto get a free pass fighting

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JM22, Feb 1, 2011.


  1. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    No *******, Marquez certainly should be getting more than 10% of a split against Pacquiao, which btw is what was being offered him!

    A 90/10 split, thats ****ing hillarious *******!:lol::nut
     
  2. valdosta

    valdosta Member Full Member

    499
    10
    Oct 19, 2004
    There's no excuse for either fight they both suck.
     
  3. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,975
    9
    Apr 12, 2009
    JMM is looking to get a shot at the p4p king, fighting a shot Erik will not help his cause. Cotto is looking for a win after two beatings.

    I think that JMM has been taking carrer advice from Winky.
     
  4. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009

    **** PAC and his team, how many times can the PACQUIAO team avoid Marquez like the plague? Marquez has been chaising ms pacman forever and the dude just keeps avoiding and avoiding... "they over priced themselves" BS

    Come on he is a 38 year old man, why so scared?

    40 year old is the golden ticket for JMM.
     
  5. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,975
    9
    Apr 12, 2009
    Yeah by taking on Chris in Indo' for $30,000, instead of fighting Pac again.
     
  6. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Funny how the ******* has no clue of what truth and reality is.......

    The ******* spews untruths like Marquez fighting John for 30K instead of Pacquiao again.......

    Marquez fought John almost 2 years after turning down Arum's first and only offer for a Pacquiao rematch.....
    .....yet the ******* always paints it as if Marquez was given a choice between fighting Pacquiao for 650K or John for 30K.....:nut



    Here is another reality the ******* cant grasp.......
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZr6MZDBPZI&feature=player_embedded[/ame]


    .....the ******* either invents, ignores, or cant grasp reality in either case.:deal
     
  7. I1T2BOX

    I1T2BOX Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,713
    1
    Jun 5, 2010

    When was the last time marquez looked like cotto at the end of a fight(marg/pac/clottey/judah):nono
     
  8. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    *******s also like to forget how Pac turned down 7 mil for the immediate 3rd fight and fought Diaz for 3 mil. If that isnt the ultimate duck i dont know what is. He took over half less just because he knew he got a lucky decision in that second fight. When your own journalist say you lost you lost. I mean even boxrec has it listed on their details how the majority of ringside observers and writers had JMM winning. It was clear as day. Yes it was close but JMM should have gotten the nod. When he didnt he obviously wanted the immediate fight to get it and Pac knowing he had just gotten lucky wanted no part of it.
     
  9. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009

    :deal

    *******S Don't reply to this. They much rather post a GIF of Marquez on the ground followed by the next batch of *******s to post a smiley...

    It's like talking to a child except they can actually grasp simple information presented to them.
     
  10. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    I dont know if you would agree or not, but the better way to describe it was "it was competitive, but a clear as day win for Marquez."

    Close is not really the word to use in this situation, the word "competitve" I believe describes it much better.

    A fighter can be competitive but be clearly losing the rounds, in such a case the fight really should'nt be close on the scorecards.
    This is how imo the Marquez-Pacquiao fight should be described.
     
  11. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    :lol: You are one upset chick D. Must suck this happens every month to you. Marquez deserves his highest pay day against PAC, which he would have received if he or his advisers had any business sense or even a ounce of common sense.. So now JMM is fighting Erik Morales for a fraction of what he could have gotten to get a 3rd crack at the guy who beat him twice? The sword cuts both ways....he's making less paper fighting EM but he's likely to win and won't take anywhere near the punishment PAC would hand him.....but, taking the easy route does little for his legacy and pockets.

    You and JMM drinking the same Kool-Aid....or more fitting in this situation....the same ****. JMM's urine seems to be some powerful stuff.:rofl That's ****in hilarious!
     
  12. strongarm

    strongarm Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,681
    3
    Dec 5, 2008
    This. Enough said.
     
  13. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Marquez got his highest payday in the Mayweather fight, Pacquiao was'nt willing to let Marquez make the same ammount he got for Mayweather.......

    .....oh, I forgot, maybe Marquez was over pricing himself, Pacquiao does'nt sell as many PPV as Mayweather does!:yep:D


    ......and yet, who wants financial parity for a Mayweather fight???

    I think its this roidster right here.....
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZr6MZDBPZI&feature=player_embedded[/ame]