You have to remember that Mayweather is a small welter....even though he tried to make Marquez go all the way up to 147...chicken****
He ain't that small! Marquez is a fighter who had to stretch to make 135. He was dwarfed by Juan Diaz. Mayweather is the much bigger man, and the much lesser human. Pathetic cherry picking.
casamayor is shot and an old man. he lost to sta. cruz and even got KD'd out of the ring by a very limited katsidis. as for juan diaz, he defeated a way past prime freitas and a julio diaz who got KO'd early by an unknown fighter named reyes. juan diaz also just barely squeeked past the same katsidis who fought old man casa. nate campbell also defeated juan diaz. you really call these two (casa and j. diaz) challenges for marquez?! :huh jmm's last real challenge was his rematch w/ pac. but i have to admit that pbf will definitely be his ultimate test though.
You're a moron. How was David Diaz a challenge, losing to a shot Morales? How was Solis and the second Barrera fight challenges for pac? Barrera was coming off a lose while Casamayor was the lineal champ at lightweight. And Juan was a unified champ.atsch
Either way you slice it up, JMM's last 2 wins are more credible than Pac's. Both Juan Diaz and Casamayor were rated higher than DLH and D DIaz.
you're the moron. never in my post did i say that david diaz was a challenge. never even mentioned solis or the second barrera fight as challenges either. :nut and juan diaz already lost his titles to campbell when he fought marquez. casa may be the supposed lineal champ but campbell was the real lightweight champ, not casa and not juan diaz. :deal
only their last two fights?! :-( how about comparing their competition for the last five years since their first fight in 2004. :deal
When talking about the PFP list, I usually go back about 2-3 years, or use a fighters las 4-6 fights as reference just to make it as current as possible. If I have to go back the last five years I might give the slight edge to Pac(but reluctantly since IMHO JMM beat him both times). I try to be objective, do you:think