hmm... so, if you're filipino and scored it for jmm, then you are educated. now, that's a great arguement. and one of those filipino broadcasters actually scored it 114-113 for pac giving marquez the 12th and pac, the 1st round. i guess he isn't educated. :hi:
you idiots really need to stop taking credit away from Pacquiao. no one is going to beat Marquez convincingly and last nights fight was not a robbery because the judges had Pac winning by 1 point. it was a close fight and you sore losers need to stop ****ing crying so much. it is what is.
It annoys me to see Joe C at #2 with the little that he has done while guys like Pac and Marq who face greater fighters or have greater skill takeing a back seat to this still really unproven fighter.
Roy Jones was p4p no. 1 for ages despite his opposition. Everyone knows how skilled Calzaghe is and has been world champ for a decade. That tells a lot. I have the same p4p rankings, Mayweather, Calzaghe, Marquez and Pacman.
This is ridiculous, how the **** do you lose to a fighter and then jump ahead of him in the rankings?
JMM did win the fight, and he proved that he was better. I've never seen what made Pac some people's #1, other than dislike of Mayweather. P4P is about ability, not achievement, and JMM showed that he beats Pac, even if the judges picked the bigger star to win.
Whos the avatar chick shes spectacular I had Marquez by a point, if I'd have given the 11th to Pac he would have won by a point on my card. Very close, I dont think a superior fighter has been established from the 2 fights, roll on the third :bbb
I know you Packies always have to fib a little to make you man look better but in reality the results were closer to 60/40 that Pac should not have been given the victory. Nice Try though:deal