As we now know ... PAC must have been drained at 126 when he fought JMM first time and he beat him clearly the second time, now PAC improved much more than JMM since then
I hope there's a third fight between Marquez and Pacquiao. If Marquez defeats Pacquiao he'll definitely be in the top 50.
Hell yeah. JMM beat Pacman both fights...more clearly in the second one. Being the only fighter esoecially Mexican fighter to ever beat him or **** it be the only fighter to ever give Pacman the run for his money like JMM did, twice, is enough to put him over JCC in my book. Thats my reasoning behind it.
Jose Basora fought to a draw with Ray Robinson and arguably beat him, therefore Basora must be greater than Carlos Monzon, no? I mean, THAT FEAT ALONE, is enough to put him in the top10 ATG? lol
I'm here explaining why I am saying what I am saying if you don't agree fine I don't care. How about you explain why don't agree instead of being a smartass about it. I have said many reasons why I have him over JCC than just his wins over Pacman.
Chavez was a better technician than Marquez. Better defense, more fluid combinations, better offensive, more versatile. He was a textbook pressure fighter and was a fine boxer when he had to be. The Rosario fight was an amazing performance, as were many others.
in the ATG ranks the h2h comparison is just a one factor, the record, opposition, longevity is a factor too.
True but we both know JMM is the better figher than Morales. Pacman was a one handed fighter and he blew Morales in the last 2 fights.
Wow, intriguing point of view. You apologist, Erik Morales win against Pacquiao sits better with me than any of Morales wins, or so called wins. :deal
If thats how you see it then thats how you see it my man. Doesn't matter whose right or wrong. Its not a fact...its a opinion.