Because Barrera wanted to exchange with Pac (first bout) because he sees Pac as a nobody. Nobody knows how Pac fights that time, They only know he blitz his opponent and has a good left. On the 2nd bout Barrera went on his bicycle and tried what Marquez and Morales 1 did to Pac. And everyone knows that going toe-to-toe with Pac is complete stupidity right now. Morales is an outstanding boxer, He saw the flaw of Pac that time. Pac was easy to offset before as he just throw bombs and bombs away. Im a huge Morales fan, but as I see this so called 'prime' Morales won't even beat what Pacquiao is now.
but a prime morales wont lose 10 out of the 11 rounds to pacquiao. Morales uses his jab while JMM went counterpunching. As for barrera, yes, he uses his bicycle in the 2nd fight and shy away from the rematch because pac exposes that MAB is a limited fighter
he gets plenty of credit. If you saw the fight then the official result should not affect how good you consider Marquez. The judges decide who won, but watching the fight is the only way to know how well he performed. He performed incredibly well despite losing and he gets credit for it..
another therapy session for jmm nuthuggers/pac haters. i can just imagine them rocking back and forth in their chairs muttering continuously "jmm was robbed...jmm was robbed...jmm was robbed..."
Congrats for your originality! this is probably the 100th thread about the pac VS jmm! If JMM does not win! EXPECT another 100 threads about pac vs jmm! Come to think of it! I can't blame you. Coz there is nothing much to talk about JMM's resume.. Unless you want to really expound on his win with MAB at the height of his career at 38 and his win at the height of CASA at 37