Marquez-Pac II JMM was robbed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Martini643, Aug 30, 2009.


  1. snell

    snell FEU-NRMF Full Member

    1,286
    0
    Jun 2, 2009

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  2. snell

    snell FEU-NRMF Full Member

    1,286
    0
    Jun 2, 2009

    you are just mad moron that *******s own your ass and buried all your heroes 6 feet under :good:good:good:good:lol::lol::lol::lol:

    know nothing... stupidooo.. :thumbsup
     
  3. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Same posters all over again. The same people start the same post, with the same posters agreeing . Nothing new. Get over it. It has been 2 years already and officially, JMM lost.

    Now, if you need reality check, see a shrink. Your obsession is already affecting your day to day existence. Probably, the idea that JMM won the fight is what makes you maintain to your sanity, then I won't fault you to it. but I won't encourage it also because detachment from reality is a sure sign of psychosis.

    Whoever posted that JMM won convincingly should have his head examined as well. There is a reason why some JMMTard, who pretend to know all, keep on posting threads like this - they need reinforce that strong belief that JMM win, a reminder which is common among insecure or unsure people. Just like a person with no self-worth would need to remind himself continuosly that he is something.
     
  4. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Somebody is mentioning that MAB was 38 when he got beaten by JMM.....somebody should enlighten this poor clown.









    JMM is actually a year older than MAB!:lol:
     
  5. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    YOU picked JMM, DLH and HAtton against pac...they all lost...


    Therefore, if you(teddy atlas of ESB) hadn't picked JMM, he would have won...:lol::rofl
     
  6. GcIII

    GcIII Active Member Full Member

    932
    0
    Jun 27, 2009
    hmmm.... same old haters who are rejoicing mentioning JMM name alongside Pac.

    Sad to say but history will record JMM as a mere victim of Pac.

    You can all perish with jealousy. Meanwhile *******s are:smoke, laughing all at the Pacterons.
     
  7. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    WOW! BIG deal one year older one year younger!

    Some clowns up to know are crying!

    and still talking about the JMM vs PAC I and 2.

    WHY?!





































































































    COZ THERE IS NOTHING MUCH TO TALK ABOUT THE ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF JMM :lol::lol::lol:

    Hey! PAC FANS If you wanna SILENCE the DIE HARD JMM fans let them talk about the ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS! :lol::rofl:lol:

    Too bad! NONE of them have the guts to say that JMM has better ACCOMPLISHMENTS that PAC!

    yUP! Even NACHO has no GUTS to say THAT!:hi:




    Yup! But they will notice and rejoice if you have wrong spelling, your grammar, etc...:silly:rofl

    BUT WHEN ASKED ABOUT the REAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS expect silence!:tong

    BUT if you asked them about WOULD HAVE, COULD HAVE..................
    the list is ENDLESS!


    DAMN! they can write a book! Yes! I call it the book of IMAGINATION!
     
  8. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    roach is on record saying after the 11th, that he thought manny was losing and needed a KO to win....that should tell you something...I wouldnt put it under the "robbery" category though
     
  9. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004
    :huh
     
  10. artofwar

    artofwar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    marquez tried to retrieve a career which he feels did not live up to his high standard with a win over pac. he feels the world owes him something. the truth is that a long part of his career he was protected and cherrypicked, only know he had the balls to fight the best. marquez is skilled, and great., but he needs to stfu and make his own legacy and stop living of pacs. dont blame your entire career on the pac fight and blame yourself. you were the one that fought nobody's for a big portion of your career. and you are the one that created your not so fan freindly style of boxing.
     
  11. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Disagree with the TS about respect.

    The reason JMM is getting a very big paycheck on Sept 19 and P4P #2 is because of his close fights (though officially a loss) with Pac. Not because of his loss against Chris John or win against MAB. Hence, he's currently sowing the seeds and milking on that particular part of his resume.

    He's one of the most popular and respected boxers at the moment (P4P #2, a fight with Mayweather), I don't get where in heck did the "didn't get the respect and star status he deserve" part came from.
     
  12. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says. . .

    how many years have gone by and we're still arguing?

    It was a close fight that could've gone either way. no robbery. if it was a robbery then you can argue that Pac got robbed the first fight where one of the judges didn't score a knockdown correctly which caused a draw.
     
  13. Blue_Ray

    Blue_Ray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,634
    0
    Apr 17, 2009
    Judges cheated him. Marquez won. But how come he crossed oceans to ask for a rematch? That's an odd thing for a winner to do.
     
  14. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Pac haters tend to nitpick abot things that give JMM an advantage, while disregard things that do not go in their favor.

    Example :


    They were complaining that Judge stewart gave a scorecard of 115-110 in JMM pac 1, meaning that that is a 7 rounds to 5 rounds in favor of Pac. The poor judge was labelled inept, and worse, corrupt. What they failed to mention is that the other judge, Guy Jutras, had in in favor of JMM with a scorecard ofn 115-110, That is 10 rounds for JMM and 2 rounds for Pac, an incredulous scorecard as well. Both judges scored the 1st round appropriately at 10-6 though. The decider judge, had it at 113-133 with him scoring the first round 10-7.

    In the second fight, Pachaters started scoring the 8th round a 10-8 round, for obvious reason. The extreme generosity however does not apply universally. A 10-8 scorecard in the 8th round favors JMM, therefore, it is legitimate and valid. For everybopdy's enlightenment, not a single judge in that fight nor the writers, scored that round a 10-8 round. But then again, they are inept and worser, corrupt. Since they are so generous with the 8th round, the fact that videos showed JMM holding to the rope after 2 (two) punches THAT CONNECTED from Pac warrants a 10-7 round, it became not valid because it is a referee's call. Their generosity does not extend actually to everybody but only to JMM. This despite the fact that they are scoring the fight in hindsight or using video recall.

    Notice who keeps putting up threads like this? same people over and over again, not a *******.
     
  15. Blue_Ray

    Blue_Ray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,634
    0
    Apr 17, 2009
    JMMorons have kept rehashing threads like this, as if they can change what was recorded in boxing journals. Keep hoping, morons. Hope springs eternal.