Marquez-Pac II JMM was robbed

If I lie is said a hundred and one times it will become the truth as far as that person is concerned..

"You have a problem differenciating the truth from from opinion"

 

Because they are starting to hear their own voices in a third person. It is like Mayweather talking in third person.

Gospel according to Mayweather : "The floyd will KO his opponent."

When you hear yourself asking you to answer your own question, that becomes a delusion and a sure sign of PYSCHOSIS or SCHIZOPHRENIA. He probably needs to have his head examined.

Couple that with some signs that he already exhibits like :

1. Detachment from reality - "JMM was robbed of a very "convincing" win.
2. Nihilistic delusions - "Pac did not win the fight, the judges were corrupt"
3. Unable to move on after a traumatic, event changing event -the fight has been 2 years already, for Christsakes.

Those are sure signs of a need to see a psychiatrist.

 

marquez still has a chance to fight pac you tool. stop crying over hiss loss. everyone with a straight mind knows that **** was close except for delusional nuthuggers like you. read my post earlier on page 5. the world dont owe marquez nothing. he lost and he needs to get over it.

 

this martini guy always seemed to have a problem with pac after he disposed hatton like a ******. :twisted:

 

There is nothing about it. I am dead serious. He really needs to have his head examined. Who knows if there is a mini-him inside that head, after all with all the empty space inside that skull, there could be someone living insisde it.

 

Boxing is crooked.

 

mantacougar,

i am surprised that they let you back to esb milmascaras.

 

those people who are saying that marquez are robbed as idiots.!!! because there are enough close rounds where the fight could logically go either way..!!!

 

actually he more or less pulled a kermit cintron and ejected himself out of the war/fight

 

I watched this fight yesterday as part of my jmm's career analysis and I I came to the same conclusion as I did about the first fight, pac won because of the kd's.

Without knockdowns or scoring on a round basis I have jmm winning the first 7-5 and the second a draw at 6-6.

Add in the knockdowns and jmm loses both by a point.

It demonstrated to me that jmm was a superior featherweight who had his style weakness dramatically exposed in round 1 and by round 3 had adjusted superbly to win 7 of the last 10 rounds. By the rematch pac had improved enough so that jmm was no longer the superior boxer, pac was much more refined and could pick his shots much better. Winning by virtue of a kd against one the best considered boxers in the world is the mark of a great fighter.

Could jmm have won both? Yes pac edged close rounds and all it takes is giving jmm the edge in one round extra. However i'm happy with my card, pac won both by 1 point.

 

We had a post up a couple of months ago where posters were asked to watch their 2nd fight and score it round by round. Those that took the time to score it had it a close fight. It pretty much came down to how you scored round 1 of that fight (2nd fight).

There were no robberies, could have gone either way.

 

Care to share your card (or at least a rough version of it)?

I always had it Pac by 2 points for JMM-Pac 2.
Best case scenraio that I can give JMM on the same fight is a draw.

 

114-113 pacquiao, 6 rounds each.

i had the first fight 113-112 pacquiao with marquez 7 rounds to pac's 5.


over-all marquez won 13 rounds to pac's 11 rounds but pac won the fight by virtue of his 4 knockdowns at least on my scorecard.

 

cause hes a crybaby