Marquez-Pacquiao Compubox Stats: Important or Not?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by zoo, Nov 12, 2011.


  1. zoo

    zoo Active Member Full Member

    1,424
    2
    Sep 14, 2006
    Pac won a close fight....it was no robbery. You can direct your anger at the 116-112 scorecard.....but there is simply no way in hell Marquez one 5 rounds to 7. At the very best it was a draw.

    Just to illustrate the point; According to CompuBox, Pacquiao landed 176 of 578 punches. Marquez connected on 138 of 436 punches, preferring, as in his first two fights, to counter punch. Pacquiao had a 117-100 edge in power shots.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    395,947
    78,186
    Nov 30, 2006
    Oh - and CompuBox is INFALLIBLE, right? Utterly perfect, its accuracy can't be questioned.

    :roll:
     
  3. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    12
    Jun 13, 2011
    'According to Compubox'

    That renders your opinion useless, idiot.
     
  4. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Man GTFO with that. you can't use compubox to score a fight. How about you post a scorecard instead of that.
    If you're going to use that, then you agree Marquez won the first 2 fights
     
  5. E30

    E30 Member Full Member

    470
    1
    Apr 11, 2009
    Oh so now it's according to compubox? What about the first two fights? Idiot
     
  6. Brauer

    Brauer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,565
    2
    Oct 15, 2011
    Learn boxing bro... Marquez won EASY!
     
  7. cavite

    cavite New Member Full Member

    28
    0
    Mar 4, 2005
    I will admit Marquez landed some clean shot but it was not enough to win.

    Pac was more aggressive and he outhit Marquez.
     
  8. u29236

    u29236 Active Member Full Member

    1,117
    0
    May 29, 2010

    Im with you i thought pac won narrowly. At the most marquez had a draw but no win. had marquez been the aggressor he might had won.
     
  9. cavite

    cavite New Member Full Member

    28
    0
    Mar 4, 2005
    I will admit Marquez landed some clean shot but it was not enough to win.

    Pac was more aggressive and he outhit Marquez.
     
  10. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    1. Compubox is not a legitimate indicator of how a fight went, in many if not most cases.
    2. If you take out 10 best sequences in the fight, all 10 would be Marquez punching Manny right in the kisser with flush shots.
    3. Marquez dictated the fight thuroughly, he made Pacquiao fight his fight, simple as.
    4. You don't know **** about boxing.
    5. JMM won the fight without a shadow of a doubt, its sad for him and for boxing in general. Even though bias occur, hard work and hard earned fights shouldn't sway one way or another due to popularity.
     
  11. I1T2BOX

    I1T2BOX Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,713
    1
    Jun 5, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  12. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    :rofl:lol:
     
  13. mtz

    mtz Active Member Full Member

    584
    0
    Sep 18, 2011
    lol you morons being the aggressor doesnt mean **** if your not effective and pacman didnt do **** so it gived the counter puncher the edge
     
  14. jmmpbf

    jmmpbf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    0
    Aug 25, 2010
    Marquez shoulda won again by 2 pts.
     
  15. RealBoxing

    RealBoxing Kill The Nonsense Full Member

    2,783
    0
    Feb 15, 2009
    Marquez 8 rounds to 4. It's clear as day. Lederman giving pac the 1st round let me know off the bat it was going to be a bs Hbo bias towards pacroid to push a mayweather fight. Jmm outclassed pac like it wasn't even funny. Roach in desperation in the 12th "please knock him out manny". Clear robbery. This is what gives boxing a fukd up name. Shame such a great fighter has been robbed twice now.:deal