Im sure i just agree'd it wasnt robbery and as "clear cut" as people are saying? but JMM did win it, Whether you like it or not.
If all you can do is resort to taking the **** to excuse a bad decision god help you. The sports becoming as bad as its "casual arm chair fans" Bob Arum targets, he likes people like you, you dont have the boxing education to question his ethics
It was a very close round, Pacquiao did very little himself. I expected him to come out firing and try to overpower Marquez, Marquez obviously made Manny respect his power.
He did win both of those fights, if KD's aren't counted. Since there were no KD's this time around, the analogy is a bad fit.
I see what you're trying to dispute, but it's the way they carried the fight that people argue for. Marquez made Pacquiao fight his fight. Not the other way around. Manny was never able to set his own pace and instead fell into Marquez' game for most of the bout. If only compubox mattered, then why wasn't Marquez awarded the previous fight when he out-landed Manny by a larger margin of connected punches..? He did go down once, but overall he won the fight itself as it is argued in tonight's fight as well by many.
It wasn't a robbery but Marquez definitely made a good case that he won it and I gave it to him. I do agree however, that he should've went for the win the last two rounds.