didn't pac look for worse for wear after his fight after clottey? and i thought it was a pretty well known fact that some fighters bust up easier than others. i thought marquez landed much more cleaner and by far the harder shots in the fight.
atsch Do you understand how stupid you sound right now??? I'm not making excuses... I'm not hiding behind anything. ****ing Marquez lost... It seems you're trying to do what you're accusing me of... I'm find, but it seems you're not. :tong:smoke
Didn't watch even every round but what I saw was Pac being pretty much schooled. Floyd must be kicking himself for the test demand. Can't see even HBO being able to built the hype back.
its true that compubox is not a legit indicator but it can serve as a guide no more no less. taking best sequence and what looks good is not a good indicator either since most of that came from rounds 5 where marquez won clear. the other side of the draw is that pac did fight aggressive and in close rounds, the judges could have gave most of it for pac. i know the criteria is effective aggression, judges would probably give it to the aggressor in rounds where few exchanges happened.
i love how *****s would turn this into a pacquiao bash. so having a close fight with an elite fighter like jmm which he already have 2 close rounds before means pacquiao is a fraud?
Butt hurt Mayweather fans and mexicano contingent are the only tools who think this was a robbery. Close fight. Manny 115-113 on my cards. Manny landed more. Manny pushed the fight and controlled the center of the ring. Manny was the champ. next.