Marquez-Pacquiao Compubox Stats: Important or Not?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by zoo, Nov 12, 2011.


  1. Tekniqs

    Tekniqs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,911
    4
    Aug 12, 2010
    didn't pac look for worse for wear after his fight after clottey? and i thought it was a pretty well known fact that some fighters bust up easier than others. i thought marquez landed much more cleaner and by far the harder shots in the fight.
     
  2. PeteDawg

    PeteDawg Observant Observer Full Member

    2,918
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    :patsch

    Do you understand how stupid you sound right now??? I'm not making excuses... I'm not hiding behind anything. ****ing Marquez lost... It seems you're trying to do what you're accusing me of... I'm find, but it seems you're not. :tong:smoke
     
  3. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010
    Marquez won.


    See, everyone can play this game.
     
  4. woody8

    woody8 New Member Full Member

    92
    0
    Apr 26, 2009
    Remeber Pete... the minority ;)
     
  5. davebenoit

    davebenoit Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,639
    0
    Mar 20, 2010
    That's your opinion but Pac still wins. You have the right to cry though.
     
  6. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    Didn't watch even every round but what I saw was Pac being pretty much schooled.

    Floyd must be kicking himself for the test demand. Can't see even HBO being able to built the hype back.
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    its true that compubox is not a legit indicator but it can serve as a guide no more no less. taking best sequence and what looks good is not a good indicator either since most of that came from rounds 5 where marquez won clear.

    the other side of the draw is that pac did fight aggressive and in close rounds, the judges could have gave most of it for pac. i know the criteria is effective aggression, judges would probably give it to the aggressor in rounds where few exchanges happened.
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i love how *****s would turn this into a pacquiao bash. so having a close fight with an elite fighter like jmm which he already have 2 close rounds before means pacquiao is a fraud? :lol:
     
  9. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,717
    3,531
    Jun 15, 2010
    Butt hurt Mayweather fans and mexicano contingent are the only tools who think this was a robbery.
    Close fight.

    Manny 115-113 on my cards.
    Manny landed more.
    Manny pushed the fight and controlled the center of the ring.
    Manny was the champ.

    next.
     
  10. sg85

    sg85 Bang on the chan Full Member

    2,045
    0
    Dec 24, 2009
    Fail.
     
  11. PUNCHDRUNK

    PUNCHDRUNK Darth Booth Full Member

    2,400
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    This is hilarious, I don't know who's more butt-hurt.....the JMM fanboys or the *****s:rofl
     
  12. I1T2BOX

    I1T2BOX Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,713
    1
    Jun 5, 2010
    The funny thing is that out of like 15 gifs, only 1 shows pac landing a shot. :hat
     
  13. boxinger

    boxinger Guest

    :happy
     
  14. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    :shock::shock::shock:

    Holy ****. I need to watch that fight again.