marquez says he will follow Pac to 147

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by eliqueiros, Dec 10, 2008.


  1. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    you are just a cry baby thats all. jmm fighting casa?? :lol:
     
  2. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008

    my boy will beat you poster boy at any given weight and age and punch him into oblivion. pac owns mab at any moment in time. you are just crying pac owns every hero you got. truth. :good
     
  3. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Will he beat Linares? Will he beat Valero? Will he beat Guzman? Will he beat Juanma? Will he beat Soto?

    How much do you want to bet we will NEVER find out?
     
  4. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    And?:lol: Every fighter is different...some fighters can have a career full of wars like Gatti and still able to fight on for yrs....Guys like a Ried had one war or one bruatal beat down they were never the same.

    Yea....everyone PAC beat were either shot, semi shot or on their way to being Shot!:rofl YOu are the excuse king aren't you? Do yourself a favor and stop loosing money betting against PAC. Hopefully that will resolve your "***** on the rag" Symptoms.
     
  5. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Truth? You haven't given any truths or facts in your OPINIONS. You said MAB was shot, JMM was shot and EM was shot...none of which are true and none can be validated....on the contrary stated these men are shot yet they are able to preform on the sports highest levels would suggest your posts as utter Bull****! JMM vs MAB showed not only that MAB is not shot but probably an overall better boxer than JMM. JMM fighting Casa and PAC proved that he too is still relevant and able to preform on boxings highest levels.....EM...he beat David Diaz IMO and being able to beat a current champion even though a limited one in David would suggest anything BUT him being completely shot! Your opinions are just that....but on top of your opinions they are incredibly weak.
     
  6. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Don't hate me for pointing it out. It's a fact. All of the semi-retired guys that Pac fought had wars with young lions in their absolute PRIME, they EARNED their accolades. Pac is getting by fighting old guys and relying on a rabid fan base that is very easily impressed.

    Too bad for you.
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    lmao :lol:
     
  8. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    THat's not PAC's fault...he was taking on better comp than Valero, Linares, Or GUzzy. If PAC took on Linares, Guzzy, and Valero...beat them all and didn't face JMM, MAB or EM BELIVE Me....there would be a lot harsher critisim from the media and haters alike. PAC has made the most out of his career and legacy going the route he has taken....it's picture perfect for the most part and how can any knock him unless they are stupid, ******ed...a combination of both or just a plain hater!
     
  9. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    yes to all except maybe juanma 5 years from now. juanma imo is the best among those you mentioned.
     
  10. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Not only was MAB clearly past his best, he had to deal with getting burned out of camp and breaking camp yet again to prove he could fight with a plate in his head. Anyone who's ever seen MAB v. McKinney knows that his best days were behind him. Morales lost to the mediocre Zahir Raheem after beating Pac, and in fact had four straight losses after beating Pac, and he would have knocked Diaz thru the ropes in his best days. His last win was against Pac, when he was getting shot but not quite there yet. JMM was 31 the first time he took 11 out of 12 rounds from Pac, and 35 when he lost a split decision to him. Don't worry, next time they fight he'll be 40 and you Pac fans can have your party. ODLH was GONE, there was nothing left of him. This can't be argued seriously, he barely got by Stevie Forbes and looked so soft and shot even Pac was willing to fight him.

    What HOF caliber fighter in his prime has Pac fought?

    I'm still waiting...
     
  11. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Yes, he made the most out of his career. Fought the biggest names around when they were a step or two off their game and headed for retirement while avoiding all the dangerous young guns. Brilliant career management, if you ask me. I would want the same if I was a fighter.
     
  12. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Too bad for me?:huh Don't waste your time feeling for me when you're own situation is cause for an intervention. You can point out anything you want....but that don't make what you said true.

    And you can say that the guys PAC beat earned their accolades by beating PRIME guys or you can be a top notch hater and analyze EM, MAB and JMM career with a fine tooth comb and project your "OPINIONS" in a why to pursuade any reader of your own stance or thoughts on a fighters career.

    YOu can look at any boxer and go through their career and find ways to discredit them...they've done it to DLH, Ray leonard, Duran, ALi...and yes....even MAB, EM and JMM when they were on top. It comes with the territory....it's easy to hate on the top guy in any arena...sports, entertainment, polotics..,...doesn't matter.

    And it's not that PAC fans or PAC fanatics are easily impressed...it's what PAC does in the ring that makes it easy to be impressed.:good
     
  13. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Yeah. If he ever did it to any young, dangerous, prime fighters I would be impressed too.
     
  14. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    No...MAB was merely past his physical prime.....but overall MAB was at his very best....if you recall MAB underwent a transformation with his boxing style. He use to be a sluggler for the most part but changed styles to give him a longer career. He became a crafty technician and was very dominating with that transformation. PAC faced the very BEST over all MAB when they first faught. In terms of experience and ring knowledge in big fights MAB was on his game.

    Raheem vs EM was a stylistic mistake and honestly EM didn't look like EM. He looked like he didn't take training camp seriously and didn't look like he took Raheem seriously either. But overall that fight was a build up to PAC vs EM and I think EM looked ahead...regardless there is no doubt that was not the best EM who faught Raheem.

    EM the first time beat PAC clearly but it was a close fight.....at that time PAC wasn't even half the fighter he is today.....So EM being past his physical best or PRime like was the Case with MAB was still one of the top players at 126 or 130 and PAC beat him too.

    JMM when he faced PAC was PRIME the first go round! And PAC won.....of course JMM was given the Draw but the world knows that the fight was actually a win for PAC. The 2nd fight was a clear close victory for PAC and a rematch would be a KO. or TKO for PAC.

    ANd Yes...How can I forget how CLOSE the DLH vs Forbes fight was. It's not like it was a Shut out where steve didn't win a round?:patsch:rofl.....Dude...are you serious? DLH "Barley got past Stevie" AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAAH That comment alone should get you smacked back to reality.
     
  15. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Ok....:lol: You just aren't going to accept reality. It's easier for you to make up your own reality even though it has no validity.