Marquez Taunts Pacquiao With Shirt.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cuco10701, Nov 28, 2010.


Page 4 of 6
  1. turk182

    turk182 not newbie Full Member

    1,315
    3
    Sep 1, 2010
    you do remember that you are talking about the 2008 130-lb version of pac who was weight-drained for their 2nd fight, right?
     
    turk182, Nov 28, 2010
    turk182, Nov 28, 2010
    #46
  2. SHERPAKOVSKI

    SHERPAKOVSKI Fastest Legs on ESB Full Member

    1,548
    0
    Aug 24, 2009

    He was weight drained and he still beat him according to boxing experts like Lampley,Merchant,Lederman and others.
    JMM thinks that he can just raise his hands after every fight and that he won.

    Pacquiao will ****ing kill JMM.

    3-0 for PACMAN
     
    SHERPAKOVSKI, Nov 28, 2010
    SHERPAKOVSKI, Nov 28, 2010
    #47
  3. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    Marquez is one bitter ****.
     
    ero-sennin, Nov 28, 2010
    ero-sennin, Nov 28, 2010
    #48
  4. zerocool1523

    zerocool1523 Active Member Full Member

    1,318
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    ****ing double standards. first your criticizing pac for fighting bigger guys with catch weights. now you want him to fight on a catch weight.
     
    zerocool1523, Nov 28, 2010
    zerocool1523, Nov 28, 2010
    #49
  5. SHERPAKOVSKI

    SHERPAKOVSKI Fastest Legs on ESB Full Member

    1,548
    0
    Aug 24, 2009

    No doubt about that,*** took 30 000 fight instead of 750000 for rematch with Pacquiao and then he say Pacquiao is ducking me.

    He is mentally ill for sure!
     
    SHERPAKOVSKI, Nov 28, 2010
    SHERPAKOVSKI, Nov 28, 2010
    #50
  6. SHERPAKOVSKI

    SHERPAKOVSKI Fastest Legs on ESB Full Member

    1,548
    0
    Aug 24, 2009


    Exactly,if Pacquiao vs Marquez would be at catchweight then they would talk **** and now when want him at 147 then they cry again.
    ****ing pathetic,and they also want Pacquiao to weight drain himself to 140.

    On May of 2011 will be 3 years that Pacquiao didnt make 140.
     
    SHERPAKOVSKI, Nov 28, 2010
    SHERPAKOVSKI, Nov 28, 2010
    #51
  7. ripper13

    ripper13 Active Member Full Member

    1,226
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    i wish the shirt's similar to the one Haye wrote when he was trolling the Klits, severed, bloody heads and all.
     
    ripper13, Nov 28, 2010
    ripper13, Nov 28, 2010
    #52
  8. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    ****ing ridiculous, they'll drain just about every person who wants to fight them, but when there's somone of equal size they want to move him up in weight :patsch
     
    Arcane, Nov 28, 2010
    Arcane, Nov 28, 2010
    #53
  9. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    These *******s can't see the irony.
     
    whoupicking?, Nov 28, 2010
    whoupicking?, Nov 28, 2010
    #54
  10. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    :nut

    Funny how Alex Ariza was saying Pacs best weight is 140, but clear *******s like yourself seem to think he would be 'draining' himself. The only reason Roach said 147 or no fight is because they know Marquez would give them hell and want to take away his effectiveness as much as possible.
     
    Arcane, Nov 28, 2010
    Arcane, Nov 28, 2010
    #55
  11. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    :lol:
     
    arsabs, Nov 28, 2010
    arsabs, Nov 28, 2010
    #56
  12. paulcris

    paulcris Member Full Member

    428
    0
    Jul 27, 2008
    A fight at 140 would be a more competitive and exciting fight. But Pac's team may demand the fight to be at 147 just because they can. and that is sad.
     
    paulcris, Nov 28, 2010
    paulcris, Nov 28, 2010
    #57
  13. rookie

    rookie Active Member Full Member

    582
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    lol at marquez being obsessed. team pac should only accept the marquez fight if floyd or any better opposition is not available. this fight is not top priority, matter of fact kinda lame atm.
     
    rookie, Nov 28, 2010
    rookie, Nov 28, 2010
    #58
  14. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    Yes any legitimate fight against a non plodder is lame :nut
     
    Arcane, Nov 28, 2010
    Arcane, Nov 28, 2010
    #59
  15. Daft P

    Daft P Active Member Full Member

    1,434
    128
    Feb 27, 2005
    :****off
     
    Daft P, Nov 28, 2010
    Daft P, Nov 28, 2010
    #60
Page 4 of 6