Nah Divac you could talk yourself to what ever you like to HYPE up your fighter . . . you can't stop NUT HUGGING JMM for even a minute that your always out of line. You are missing the whole point of that statement. Yeah Nate was beating Diaz even before the headbutt . . .but did Diaz surrendred because of the "BODY SHOTS"? He slowed down a bit because the cut distracting his concentration. How did Nate won? SD! 115-113/113-115/116-112 . . . . a close one. :deal . . . . you've got to think clearly now bud . . . are you expecting JMM to fight Diaz the way Nate did? :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Very even fight I pick the younger Diaz he wiil dictate the pace in the other hand Marquez is the better boxer with an excesive mileage I think the pressure from Diaz wiil result in a close UD.
Oh, Nate only won a split decision.....you must feel Diaz was competitive with Nate???? .....oh, I forgot, you're a Pac fan....Pac fans are of the thinking that judges always get it right, I see...... The Pac fan say's, "there is no such thing as a bad decision, or even a bad scorecard by them....Judges rule!"
Don't dragged the arguement somewhere else Divac . . . you came into the picture and critize me and my statement . . . stick to the point . . . did Diaz surrendered to Nate because of the body shots? :deal Forget about Pac . . . this is not about Pac . . . forget about the bullcrap judges . . . I was talking about "body shots". :yep Let's hear it. :think
I addressed that in my earlier post to you.....Diaz took alot of body shots by Nate Campbell thoughout the fight...... The body shots took alot of starch out of Diaz' punches, as he faded badly in the second half of the fight. Campbell's work to Diaz' body slowed Diaz, or are you to tell me that because Diaz saw the final bell, we can dismiss Campbell's body work altogether??? Not all fighters slowed due to body punishment are going to be stopped. I've never questioned Diaz' toughness!
Im a pacfan, but you have to exclude me from those who think that Judges gets its right all the time. ex: 1. Pac shoulda won the first match if it wasnt for that Judge who admitted making a mistake with the scores. Damn the judge! 2. Penalosa vs PDL scores were crazy! damn those judges! 3. PBF won that by a wider margin (vs DLH) damn those judges! 4. JMM vs CJ shoulda been reversed. damn those judges! lots more!
Yeah . . . you're not questioning Diaz' toughness . . . so what your problem now? If JMM would stop Diaz . . . it would be logical for anybody who has brain to think that JMM being an accurate technical fighter will do it via counters while Diaz is trying to get close and not by body punches. He won't fight Nate's kind of fighting. :yep Next time you come into the picture of an arguement . . .try to understand it first . . . and don't argue because you knew I'm a Pac fan. :deal
I know that its not every single Pac fan...... ....but from my debating with quite a few of them, they've always made it a point to say that its the judges who are there and they make the ruling. Official scorecard per se, is what they scream when JMM-Pac is talked about..... .....thats why I threw that at Psycho, when he tried to assume that Diaz was somehow competitive enough vs Campbell because Campbell only won a split decision.....atsch....when anyone that knows anything knows Campbell won the fight hands down. I'm sure Psycho does'nt feel the same way about Diaz split decision struggle with Michael Katsidis??? A struggle by Juan Diaz against a fighter KTFO by Joel Casamayor, who JMM KTFO???:yep The point I'm trying to make is that judges are baffoons, you dont assume that a fight was close or even competitive just because the fight was'nt tabulated as a UD! Juan Diaz dismantled Michael Katsidis, but scorecards only show a split decision for the effort!:!: