Marquez vs Pacquiao III will be an Extremely close fight

This crackhead just copied a response given by Mayweather in an interview.

Typical Groupie with sheep mentality.

Has no thoughts of his own.

All he does is repeat the same **** that comes out of the Mayweather's mouth.

 

How can you be a hitman fan and mayweather nuthugger at the same time?

 

I disagree, no amount of experience and coaching can make a bloke turn from a good fighter to (what most Pac fans say) top 3 of all time

 

No, it's all my own views.

P.s stop putting watermellons down your pants

 

Im a fan of Rickys, the way he fights always exciting. Body shots and aggressive. Also his deminor outside the ring, a man of the people and a good character who embrased the public

I'm a "Mayweather nuthugger" because of his boxing ability. Sheer genius in being able to adapt to any style, never get him and dominate opponents. Its craftsmanship the way he can box and to me it's absolutly amazing

Also from being a baby in the crib, he doesn't drink or smoke and has dedicated himself to his craft and has given his life to the sport.

Yes his deminor outside the ring is appauling, it's very rude and abnoxious but he sells tickets and we need characters like Floyd who can sell fights with his mouth (Haye also) He doesn't truly hate or despise his opponents, but does what he can to sell the fight. No fight sells better than a bad guy v a good guy. At times he is very funny with what he says and his arrogance and confidence makes him a worldwide star

 

:good

100% agree

 

Then you have the views of a dope fiend.

Stop doing lines of coke from Ricky's dick.

And peds from Floyd's bunghole.

Then Maybe you'll start making some sense.

 

pac is just on a different level, let's have it right. he'll blitz marquez then prob blitz bradley after.

 

It’s quite funny when you analyze all the comments surrounding Pac-JMM. A large section of the Pac detractors always refer back to the JMM fights as evidence of Pac actually not having improved that much and that he’s still that same fighter. They claim he’s been feasting on opponents that are stylistically suited to him, and thus creating the illusion that he’s an improved fighter.

However, now that the third fight with JMM has been signed, these same people have quickly changed their tune. Despite Pacquiao supposedly being the same fighter, they now feel he should run JMM through the ground.

:huh

Well, it’s pretty clear what they’re doing. They’re covering their asses on both ends. If Pac does go on to destroy JMM, they’ll say “Well, it was to be expected. We predicted he would”. But if he struggles with him, they’ll go back to “Told you so! Pac ain’t ****. He still that same fighter from 3 years ago! Dude is overrated!”. Immediately dismissing Pac-JMM III as a mismatch like they're currently doing, simply provides them with the chance to criticize Pac if he provides anything less than a spectacular performance.

 

And if he doesn't?

 

It provides the likes of you the perfect opportunity to gloat for him failing to live up to these high expectations. It’s a catch 22 scenario for Pac.

 

Well it shouldnt be close

 

Marquez is my all time favourite fighter but i'll be honest and say i dont expect him to win this fight. I cant see Pacquiao, or anyone for that mater, being able to stop the Mexian warrior though. It is a bit of a concern that Katsidis was able to clearly hurt him at lightweight and Marquez admitted that was the most hurt he has ever been, but the fact remains that when he gets knocked down he gets back up. I think Marquez is too experienced and knows too many tricks to be knocked out. If i'm wrong and he does get stopped it will be questionable and he will still be on his feet.

Regardles of what happens you cant question his heart and if anyone deserves the benefit of the doubt it has to be Marquez.

 

Catch 22 indeed, if he loses it sucks if its competitive it sucks as well, if he wins he was supposed to so no credit either way.
I just hope its a fun fight, pac ends up the winner and he doesnt look bad like vs mosley.

 

Not only that. Some are saying Pacquiao must be on something because he went from having close competitive fights against small fighters and then dominate big welters like Margo, Clottey, Cotto etc. But in other threads you will see posts saying Pacquiao cherrypicked these welters - weight drained, coming off loses, etc. Yeah, they expected Pacquiao to beat them but at the same time they can't believe Pacquiao can beat them he must be on peds? What the **** kind of logic is that? atsch