Marquez was Magnificent!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by divac, Nov 13, 2011.


Page 3 of 7
  1. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    10 rounds for jmm??? really?

    so thats what roids can do huh???
     
    hooligan, Nov 13, 2011
    hooligan, Nov 13, 2011
    #31
  2. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Manny Steward must have fallen asleep in the 12th round (maybe the 11th as well) when he said JMM just cruised after being told by Nacho he was winning.
     
    caneman, Nov 13, 2011
    caneman, Nov 13, 2011
    #32
  3. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009

    I have the same thought. My plan is to agree with Divac that JMM performed very well and above expectation. I was taken aback by the margin. :D I must admit i initially felt JMM won via slim margin (7 to 5, being an unbias pac fan that i am) when i watched it live. Scored it 7-5 in favor of Pac upon replay.

    Regardless, JMM is magnificent, a hall of famer, a Pacquiao Kryptonite and deserve all the praise he is getting. :good
     
    Cocteau, Nov 13, 2011
    Cocteau, Nov 13, 2011
    #33
  4. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    You scored it for Pacquiao in the poll.:patsch
     
    divac, Nov 13, 2011
    divac, Nov 13, 2011
    #34
  5. jmmpbf

    jmmpbf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    0
    Aug 25, 2010
    I disagree. What rounds did you give Pac?
     
    jmmpbf, Nov 13, 2011
    jmmpbf, Nov 13, 2011
    #35
  6. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    22
    Dec 12, 2009
    Marquez was awesome tonight. 7-5 for Dinamita for me! :deal
     
    Zopilote, Nov 13, 2011
    Zopilote, Nov 13, 2011
    #36
  7. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009
    1 = pacquiao
    2 = marquez
    3 = pacquiao
    4 = pacquiao
    5 = marquez
    6 = marquez
    7 = marquez
    8 = pacquiao
    9 = marquez
    10 = pacquiao
    11 = pacquiao
    12 = pacquiao

    115-113 PACQUIAO on 7 rounds to 5

    4,6,8,9 are very close (2 apiece) and not a mortal sin to disagree with my score, but a mortal sin to give it all to JMM.
     
    Cocteau, Nov 13, 2011
    Cocteau, Nov 13, 2011
    #37
  8. moulicules

    moulicules Chessmaster Full Member

    806
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
    JMM learned his lessons.. he adopted the style of Clottey and Mosley... Running... always running and counter!
     
    moulicules, Nov 13, 2011
    moulicules, Nov 13, 2011
    #38
  9. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    C'mon Puga, you know how I scored the first two fights.
    9-3 Marquez.
    The man in all three fights was clearly the Ring General, controling most of what was happening, pace, tempo and rhythm.

    What round today was clearly a Pacquiao round.
    He did'nt come close to dominating a single round tonight.
    Its useless to argue with ******* who would score a fight for Pacquiao simply because his name is Pacquiao.





    Addie, you're shameful brother........
    .......Marqeuz going right past MAB and Morales so burns your soul you could'nt find it in you to give an honest scorecard.
    Its not sad, it laughable.:lol:
     
    divac, Nov 13, 2011
    divac, Nov 13, 2011
    #39
  10. moulicules

    moulicules Chessmaster Full Member

    806
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
    pac was the aggressor all night. JMM did was to counter and running all night..
     
    moulicules, Nov 13, 2011
    moulicules, Nov 13, 2011
    #40
  11. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    You're so right! Pacquiao was coming forward. So what if he was getting pasted by straight rights and counterpunches from Marquez. HE WAS COMING FORWARD!...AND ALL THAT MEXICAN GUY WAS DOING WAS COUNTERING!

    120-108 for Pacquiao! MANNY! MANNY! MANNY!
     
    JMP, Nov 13, 2011
    JMP, Nov 13, 2011
    #41
  12. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    SO you must have scored Pac/Margarito in favor of AM based on his aggression.:think
     
    Gonzarelli, Nov 13, 2011
    Gonzarelli, Nov 13, 2011
    #42
  13. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004

    :lol::lol::lol:You're like PacDbest in his scorecard in the 2nd fight.
    He shamelessly scored it a draw, but upon learning that other *******s were having the audacity to claim Pacquiao won, he claimed to have rewatched it and scored it for Pacquiao by a point.:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
    divac, Nov 13, 2011
    divac, Nov 13, 2011
    #43
  14. nuges

    nuges Active Member Full Member

    878
    0
    Mar 30, 2010
    we all know you're a biased poster divac, but make it believable at least :oops:
     
    nuges, Nov 13, 2011
    nuges, Nov 13, 2011
    #44
  15. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    You know someone lost when their fans use the "all the other guy did was run" thing.

    I've used that argument plenty of times myself.

    But if your tagging the hell out of the other guy as you're "running" than that is scoring. Plus moving backward and running are not the same thing.
     
    eliqueiros, Nov 13, 2011
    eliqueiros, Nov 13, 2011
    #45
Page 3 of 7