Martin Murray vs. Peter "Kid Chocolate" Quillin

I like triple G but he was touched up and hit at will vs Rosado who in his own right is one savvy & touch son of a *****. Q brings a sharper more explosive skill set when compared to Rosado though Im not entirely sure he has the same durability and fortitude Rosado has shown. Q looks like hes forged from some strong stone though we havent seen him face to much adversity. If GGG dosent stop Q within the first half of the fight it would be the ultimate toss up. There's no doubt in my mind Q gets in some ferocious hooks and straight rights and it would be a nice test for GGG's chin.

 

Quillan by Ko, Sturm and Martinez are shot fighters thus Murray's good showing v both.

 

You can watch Golovkin fight, then watch Quillin fight and see a huge difference in speed, power and that 350 amateur fights has really helped Golovkin. Why doesn't Quillin fight Golovkin? Golovkin is much faster than Quillin, hits harder, no contest. Golovkin by knockout!!! And those who claim that Sergio Martinez has no fighting ability are crazy, Hell, he knocked out Paul Williams, knocked him out cold. Void refused to fight Williams..........

 

Explain HOW exactly Quillin kos Murray please. After all Murray is very big strong and durable. He also has a very tight defence and is a good basic boxer. I'm not saying Murray is certain to win, but neither is Quillin.

What is about Murray that makes you believe he is so easy to knock out?

What is it about Quillin that gives you so much faith in him?

remember Peter was no great shakes against the ancient and very shot Winky, and looked all at sea versus Hassan N'Dam.


Also Sturm was most certainly not shot against Murray, and beat Murray clearly, just didn't get the scores he deserved from the judges.

 

I'd like to see this fight. If Quillin wants to prove that he's a true fighter he should step up and fight Murray. 50/50 fight IMO.

 

Man.

You are on a run farmboxer!

Earlier you claimed Kovalev is the best middleweight around.:good

 

Americans tend to be biased? says the Brit?! Ive heard it ****in all now!

Tell me, where do you think that 62% of votes come from??

Pot and kettle thing goin on here.

 

N'Dam is legit though he'd box the **** out of Murray
It would be more one sided than Quillin vs Murray

People are understimating Quiin the guy throws hard punches from awkward angles and js getting better

Murray was good against Martinez but Martinez was terrible, Murray isnt that good

 

you think N'dam would beat Murray :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Ive heard it all now !!!!!:rofl
I give up

you racist big nosed trolling nerdy pakky **** you are british yet you hate every british fighter, go suck your fat burhka Mum

 

He's not the only one. What has Murray done? He's only ever fought two guys who would even be considered top 50 and lost both times. He was wobbled at the end of both those fights. Granted it was Sturm and Martinez, but hasn't accomplished anything yet other that he gave them both tough fights and managed to hear the final bell.

N'Dam's beaten guys like Gennady Matirosyn, Bursak, Khurtsidze, and Lorenzo who are all better fighters than anyone Murray has a win over. And he should've had a win over Quillin or atleast a draw.

 

most of the general forum is americans

 

I'm not big on excuses, i'm sure it played a role however Jordan also scored 60pts during a playoff game with the flu. While I respect your view it doesnt change the fact that he is no defensive wizard, not a huge knock against the guy.

 

To each his own, you seem hard up on GGG and you have of course convinced yourself that he is "much faster" than Q.....that of course is debatable though I respectfully disagree. Your quite self righteous and its admirable in a way though you sound kind like nazi supremacist