Martinez got robbed

Yes, it was a bad night for boxing!

 

I just got done watching the fight. Martinez got screwed bad.

I scored the fight 115-111 for Martinez.

 

**** you too dip****! I've been posting on ESB before you were even a mistake. so go **** yourself and take that other *** with you.

 

So you have the right to call someones mother or sister a ***** you ****ing schmuck.

 

What a ****ing disgrace. Martinez got robbed, as for that headbutt bull**** jesus atsch

 

huh? what do ya mean?....this was clearly a headbutt, straight outta Holyfields playbook

This content is protected

 

I saw Holyfield trying to butt Valouev, but he couldn't reach his head! LOL!

 

I would like to see a poll to see how many out here think Cintron deserved a draw. Judges like these should be brought to public to explain themselfs.
Every judge who's scorecards are different by big margin from majority of fans/experts should be banned from this sport on the spot.

 

yeah, pretty much....can some1 pleze tell me the qualifications for being a judge? cuzz i must not get it

 

the fight was a ****ing white wash. Not a master class, but a ****ing draw is absolutely ridiculous. Martinez won the fight by at least 8-4. Cintron looked like **** and should have been KOed anyways in the 7th.

 

I thought Berto/Collazo was a fair decision. I had it 114-113 Berto. Berto landed more shots and also the more powerful shots. Most of the punches Collazo landed were arm punches. However, in the Martinez fight, Martinez landed more punches as well as the harder punches. I wasn't really impressed with Martinez. He just cricled, showboated, and threw some occasional flurries. However, Cintron didn't do a damn thing and in no way deserved a draw. I have never seen a ref count to 10 and the allow the fighter to continue. And the next time Cintron fights, his opponent needs to point out to the ref beforehand that the guy likes to bend down at the waist, causing unintentional hits to the back of the head.

 

What you have to ask yourself now is:

1) Are the two judges corrupt?
2) Are they just THAT incompetent?

 

It's impossible to to accurately answer either of those questions. These guys are sitting ringside and are seeing the fight from an entirely different perspective than viewers at home. The judging criteria is also not set in stone and is very much subjective. I don't see how they could give Cintron 6 rounds, but at the same time I'm not seeing the same fight they're seeing.

 

cintron thinks he got robbed in his post fight BT interview. atsch