I don't think you're getting the point here, Zak. Few would deny you your cheap trolling thrills, if, as I said, that's what 'floats your boat.' When you get it wrong, however, you further lose credibility when you continue to fail to acknowledge your 'error.' Then again, apparently, that prospect doesn't vex you very much. That would point to one of two possibilities: 1) You're an out-and-out troll who cares little for such matters. 2) Your cred is so low you have little interest in its maintenance.
I already said I was wrong in my prediction, in my first post today. So what? People get it wrong all the time, particularly if you go against the "common wisdom." You are right about one thing - I don't really care if I am wrong, nor do I care about "cred." I am fully confident in my own knowledge of boxing, and don't really care whether others acknowledge it or not.
if chavez was a bit more skilled? really zakman? last time i checked it was 11 rounds to 1 for sergio. hows being a little bit more skilled gonna bridge that?
Again, this points to one of two possibilities: 1) You're being less than truthful (A good social scientist like you would be familiar with Maslowe :yep) 2) You're very seriously delusional.