Martinez, Maidana, Matthyse

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pinzon, Jun 25, 2011.


  1. pinzon

    pinzon Active Member Full Member

    700
    0
    Mar 13, 2010
    Martinez v Cintron
    Martinez v PW I
    Maidana v Kotelnik
    Maidana v Khan
    Matthyse v Judah
    Matthyse v Alexander

    Not all of those were robberies of course. Very close fights, not one to the foreigner without an international fan base. Boxing is a joke.
     
  2. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008


    :good
     
  3. luciuslim

    luciuslim Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,313
    0
    Jul 16, 2009
    maidana vs kahn was in no way shape or form even close to a robbery
     
  4. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Martinez v Cintron - huge robbery
    Martinez v PW I - not a robbery but a bit of a bad decision IMO
    Maidana v Kotelnik - bit of a robbery
    Maidana v Khan - Right decision but a different ref makes that a very very different fight
    Matthyse v Judah - small robbery
    Matthyse v Alexander - small robbery

    Yeah... poor Argentines.
     
  5. pinzon

    pinzon Active Member Full Member

    700
    0
    Mar 13, 2010

    Point is that any of those fights would have had the opposite result had the 3 M's been the big name hyped fighter.
     
  6. pinzon

    pinzon Active Member Full Member

    700
    0
    Mar 13, 2010
    It was pretty close. I had Khan by 2 points. If Maidana had been the money draw with all the hype, I guarantee he would have gotten the decision.

    And lets not forget the fights were always tailored for the popular fighter, i.e. cortez helping out khan, this fight shortened to 10 rounds, etc.