Marvin Hagler - not in the top twenty

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Manassa, Nov 13, 2009.


  1. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    It depends how prominent dominance is in your ranking criteria and whether you think he edged Leonard or not. Given that dominance has a prominent place in my ranking criteria and that I thought he beat Leonard he's quite high for me. In the top 20.
     
  2. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    94
    Apr 6, 2007
    Working my way through this all-time 100, I'd say that going by achievements, Hagler definitely isn't top twenty, he shouldn't be top thirty and he only just about stays inside the top forty.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,277
    48,639
    Mar 21, 2007
    I had him at around #32.

    Where the **** do you rank Dixon? :twisted:
     
  4. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    94
    Apr 6, 2007
    #20 you dick.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,277
    48,639
    Mar 21, 2007
    Higher than me, I also had him at 30 something I think.
     
  6. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    10,718
    8
    Aug 4, 2008

    Tom Sayers was little more than the standard M/W.. same as Dan Donnely. Turps' me mate, You've upset both their Mums.. Now ya is strife!!! :yep
     
  7. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    94
    Apr 6, 2007
    I'll give you one name I rate above Hagler, just as a teaser. Benny Bass.
     
  8. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    10,718
    8
    Aug 4, 2008
    Carmen 'BennyHill' Bassilio???? :rofl
     
  9. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    94
    Apr 6, 2007
    Actually that was wrong. That was in my first draft, but now Hagler's higher than Bass. First time, it was nearly a random order but things are now coming together.

    I do rate Manuel Ortiz higher.
     
  10. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Manassa, why you have Ali rated so high and Roy Jones nowhere in sight? IMO, Jones is the more formidable fighter.

    Ali doesnt even throw body shots, and his best shot is a right cross while Jones had even more speed, could end a fight with a body shot, better combination puncher, more dominant, equal power in both the right and left. Jones was the more complete fighter.

    Ross and Mclarnin, no way. And Dixon, I'm not sure what he did that puts him others.

    And Hagler to me seems to be getting the shaft if you cant even put him in the top 30, much less 40. He seems to make many choices seem ordinary by comparison. It's a free country though