Marvin Hagler v Mike McCallum

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, May 10, 2012.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    McCallum UD, just overall a smarter boxer but it'd be close
     
  2. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,588
    Jan 22, 2009
    This is the problem with these opinions.It is obvious that Hagler was past it in these 2 fights.
     
  3. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,588
    Jan 22, 2009
    In 1988,Mike McCallum got outboxed by Sumbu Kalambay at middleweight,but he's going to beat a prime Hagler?Fraid not.
     
  4. FastHands(beeb)

    FastHands(beeb) Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,496
    412
    Oct 28, 2010
    This. You get some preposterous revisionism on some matches as time passes. When both McCallum & Hagler were both active, there wasn't a lot of demand for this fight...that's because it wouldn't have been deemed as very competitive.

    Disappointing for some to contemplate, but true. By the end of his career McCallum had an impressive body of work, but at the time, not nearly enough to convince many that he would have dethroned MMH.
     
  5. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,246
    15,456
    Feb 2, 2006
    I like Mccallum but damn he is getting overrated.Kalambay boxed his ears off EASILY and while Kalambay was a great boxer he wasnt on prime Leonard or Haglers level.
    I mean look at how a damaged Curry was pickinHg Mccallum apart until Mccallum knocked him out and imagine Leonard/Hagler prime in with Mccallum.
    And for the record its been said MANY times that Mccallum was hard to work with and alot of possible fights he could have had would fall through because Mccallum would outprice himself right out of the fight.
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    exactly
     
  7. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    this happened a few times and then he did not know how to market himself. And losing to Kalambay after his first big win against Curry took away the momentum he got from that fight.
     
  8. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    Hagler never fought McCallum although McCallum was one of the top guys at the time.
     
  9. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010

    That's because he cheated himself out of the opportunity to get the big fight by doddling around cutting weight at 154.He has no real justification for his bitterness towards Hagler, who would have fought him had he opted to go the classic route through the other contenders at 160.


    Well unless it was circa 86 by the time he managed to establish himself, by which time Marv was only in it for the big money fights.still, i think McCallum could have established himself as a contender by 83 or 84 if he played his cards right.
     
  10. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,178
    16,962
    Jun 9, 2007
    Hagler by decision in a very good fight.