Marvin Hagler vs Gennady Golovkin At MW

Agreed. It's very hard to predict this fight since GGG hasn't truly been in a fight with a great contender. My intuition tells me he beats Hagler, but we haven't seen GGG in deep waters yet.

 

This is the correct answer GGG hasn't fought the elite comp yet. But against the mid tier GGG's looked better than Hagler has against the mid tier comp he fought

 

GGG is still unproven. A skilled hard punching fighter yes but unproven. Hagler was not only an ATG but few fighters were AS proven. Hagler knocks out GGG mid fight.

 

unproven at elite level yes, but he has proved himself 2 or 3 times at world.

 

What great opponents? Haglers legacy is heavily based on him fighting a Lightweight and two Welterweights.

It's funny that two of the ATG Middleweights never had to move up to Light Heavyweight to prove their greatness, Hagler and Monzon....

 

Hagler KO3 - Proven ATG Tommy Hearns

GGG RTD5 - Unproven Kell Brook.

End of story.

 

Hearns-KO loss against bar-room brawler Barkley...

Barkely- points loss to Lightweight Duran...

Let's play a game of pointless points....

 

Hearns- 154 Champ
160 Champ
175 Champ

Brook - 154 ZERO
160 ZERO

 

its so weird that you take a point that supports hagler over 3g but are so blind that you think it supports 3g in preference to hagler.... its so bizarre how off kilter you are with your written views.

 

You don't even understand body types obviously. You think Hearns would have taken the shots GGG landed on Brook?? He would have been sleeping...

 

lol@ this guy arguing for Brook over Hearns questioning somebody's understanding of the sport .

 

Yes, Hearns wouldn't have took half the shots Brook did and that's coming from a Hearns fan.....

 

What about the shots Brook landed on GGG? He wouldn't have shook them so easily if that was Hearns landing them.