Marvin Hagler vs Joe Calzaghe @ 168 ??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bambalan, Nov 9, 2008.


  1. bambalan

    bambalan Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Sep 30, 2008
    i got hagler by TKO in 10, he will be too much for calzaghe, calzaghe pity pats will be no match for hagler short accurate strong punches on the inside
     
  2. pirlo

    pirlo Active Member Full Member

    1,301
    0
    Jul 14, 2007
    Hagler KO 3
     
  3. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Hagler all day everyday.
     
  4. jasedikio

    jasedikio Active Member Full Member

    800
    0
    Nov 18, 2007
  5. Gatekeeper78

    Gatekeeper78 Active Member Full Member

    674
    0
    Jul 28, 2008
    Hagler takes it, he would be too strong and relentless.
     
  6. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Oh boy this would have been really a treat to the sport of boxing.

    I think Hagler will be beaten to the punch most of the time but takes JC's punches well.

    In the end I think Hagler wins by hard fought late TKO.
     
  7. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    Hagler wasn`t a huge puncher and John Mugabi had not problem hitting Marvin with plenty of shots. Joe would hit Hagler at will all night.
     
  8. HOF

    HOF Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,873
    0
    Feb 10, 2008
    Lol. As Roy stated after the fight those 'pitty pats' are a little heavier than he thought they'd be
     
  9. bambalan

    bambalan Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Sep 30, 2008
    he find them heavier bc he is a shot fighter that cant handle alot of punches anymore what is so hard to understand,, im talking about a prime hagler
     
  10. Brian123

    Brian123 ESB WORLD CHAMPION Full Member

    2,765
    3
    Feb 16, 2008
    Hagler simply would not have the speed. Much like Joe C. proved last night when he was a step and half away from Roy Jones sticking out his chin-Jones could not touch him.

    Do you think Hagler was faster than Jones?
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,262
    11,319
    Jan 6, 2007

    Au contraire, Joe would be the stronger of the two and this wouldn't be a close affair at all.

    Hagler fought at 160 and weighed in same day.

    Joe had trouble making 168 and weighed in the previous day.


    (Hagler had competitive fights with Leonard and Duran (135 and 147 starters) and didn't outmuscle either one noticably. Joe moved Bernard (who started at 175) backwards and had no strength issues with him.

    So Joe would be in the driver's seat in the strength category.

    Also in the speed, workrate and ring generalship categories.


    Marvin was greater lb-for-lb (whatever meaning you impute to that), but head-to-head, he'd be lucky to take more than a round or two.
     
  12. Olander

    Olander Active Member Full Member

    660
    1
    Jan 19, 2005
    I could see Calzaghe winning a decision, something like 8 rounds to 4. But I could also see Hagler winning by TKO. Great mythical matchup!
     
  13. headhunter

    headhunter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,592
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Hagler is the better fighter but JC is bigger and faster 50/50 IMHO
     
  14. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    I don't see how Hagler wouldn't have to concede ground to Calzaghe with his volume of punches, speed and size/strength advantages. Calzaghe would back him up, and I don't think Hagler can perform as effectively when he is.

    He doesn't have the sort of power that is a huge one punch threat to Calzaghe either.
     
  15. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    I never saw a 168 lb Hagler.

    If Hagler is totally p.o.'ed before the fight, ala Hearns-Hagler, then he might just walk in and put JoeCal down for the count in 3 rds.

    Otherwise, JoeCal outboxes him over 12 rds.