Marvin Hagler vs. Joe Calzaghe, at a catchweight of 165, who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Jul 7, 2009.


  1. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008

    your good friend needs to learn to believe in his fighter instead of looking for excuses to defend calzaghe.

    all he did was cheapen his argument.

    EDIT..and he only did it because he was british....
     
  2. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    dumbass
     
  3. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
  4. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Have you ever watched a fight before?
     
  5. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008

    I can't hate you for that ****. Because regardless of what everyone on here is gonna say in response, the vast majority of boxing fans do the same thing...


    All my white friends (all American) were rooting for Calzaghe against Roy. They were high-fiving and ****, just happy to see the white dude kick ass. I can't be mad, because I gave them hell when Floyd fought Hatton.
     
  6. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Yet another thread where nostalgia has you remembering the old guy in his prime and taking the new guy at his worst.

    Calzaghe in his prime wasn't a slapper - ask people like Byron Mitchell how well those slaps felt. He reverted to that style after hand issues. The fact that Joe was able to dominate after hand problems and so late after his 30s shows how much better he likely was in his prime.
     
  7. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    Got to go with JOE at 168. at 160 HAgler .
     
  8. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    You cant count Calzaghe out h2h against anybody, the guys a fire*******! watch the Eubank fight, although I believe Eubank (past it) to be the better fighter but at a lower weight.

    Calzaghe throws and throws, he can overwhelm anybody if caught offguard. You need a combination of heavy hands and skills to beat him
     
  9. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,292
    15,126
    Dec 6, 2008
    Calzaghe doesn't have to hurt Hagler. He can beat him on speed/workrate.
     
  10. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    Damn, you need some new friends man. I had a mixed group of people over to watch the fight and everyone was rooting for Roy. Only assholes would be rooting for some brit to beat up, show boat and taunt a shell of a once great fighter just because he is white.
     
  11. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    You suck.
     
  12. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006

    dam then i guess im an ******* :lol:
     
  13. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    at any weight hagler would walk through anything calzaghe could offer.
     
  14. ringsider

    ringsider Active Member Full Member

    1,454
    5
    Mar 11, 2009
    Calzaghe would be beaten worse than Minter and sooner.......:good
     
  15. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Hagler would destroy Joe!! No contest at all!!! Hagler knocks out Joe in 6 rounds and leaves him bloodied and battered like Cotto in the margarito fight,Marvin had tremondous power that would give Light-Heavyweights problems