Marvin Hagler vs Sugar Ray Robinson

lamotta would **** hagler toe to toe

 

Robinson record was outstanding at welter but middleweight not so. If Randy Turpin could beat Robinson so could Hagler one off. Then in a rematch Robinson would win.

 

yes, just like if leonard could beat hagler robinson would better and faster

 

Terry Norris beats them both. On the same night.

 

Lamotta would be lucky to beat Hamsho. He'd give him a good fight tho

 

hagler would be lucky if he does not get raped against the ropes

 

Hagler dont need the luck cuz his backs never touch the ropes. but then, you wouldnt know

Marvelous jabs, hooks, N crosses Robinson into a badly battered N bleeding mess by 12

what the hell, make it 9 rds

 

not sure about that, but no doubt both of them beat Terry by 9 prime for prime.

 

youre still sore TNT whipped your man 12-0

or as I like to say, 122-106

 

I loved that fight, I called it as I told you long ago.

That doesn't change the fact I would take both Hagler and SRR over Norris prime for prime.

Are you claiming different?

 

yes

I'd like to explain but me and Vinnie are going out on the town,

 

no rush, you and Vinnie go have fun.

 

SRR at his best 160 period takes this.

 

Hagler by close decision.

Robinson was peak at 147. He won and lost the 160 title several times.

 

I have to go with Marvelous here. Too tough, too strong, too powerful. Hagler had every weapon in the book. As much as I like Robinson he gets beat up by Hagler and probably stopped on cuts.

No man that walks through prime Tommy Hearns' right hand gets hurt by anything Robinson throws.