Marvin Hagler : Without the other 3 he is Regular. FACTS INSIDE!!!

Hagler and Bumlovkin are two words that don't belong in the same sentence...

 

:deal

 

Hopkins' resume by the time he was 33 still takes a HUGE dump on Bumlovkin's...

 

Apparently you're in the mid stages of Alzheimer's...

 

Hagler eats Gennady for breakfast.

 

Thank god, somebody that knows something about boxing.

PREACH IT :deal

 

Hagler>Every boxer you like.

 

End thread.

(who was his one?)

 

I don't think so.

Duran holds a W over Iran Barkley @ 160. The Same Iran Barkley who KO'ed Thomas Hearns. There is nothing on the Triple Duck's resume that even comes close...

 

Never would have thought dude was 64 based of off the nature of his posts.

I used to go back and forth with him sometime back thinking he was some teen.

Come to find out, this overgrown baby is somebody's grandpa.atsch

 

I think GGG is a great fighter who no one will beat at middle for years. However haglar was the boy at middle I grew up watching him destroy all Comer's for his titles year in year out. without his big fights against Duran and hearns he still beat every body from middle weight from all over the world .Hagler was a house hold name their was no doubt who the champ at middle weight was not at all.

 

Yeah, how f***ng dare Hagler was better then the majority of boxers he faced. F*** him for not being a B-level guy or a scrub so that could be on equal terms with those he obliterated. And why do you think not ducking anyone who you were put up against or low-balling them was a good thing?

SMH

 

:exmad :reggie

 

No, the blasphemin' OP.

 

don't wriggle out using other very different examples, you were clearly and blatantly comparing guys one hasn't fought to put down a guy who HAS fought others.

YOur intention to draw similarities for discussion fails because you can only draw differences.