Marvin Hagler : Without the other 3 he is Regular. FACTS INSIDE!!!

yeh uhhh hes pointing out your fcukup by replying and paraphrasing your words.

so you are slating your own post. good luck with that, saves others doing it.

 

So basically you're saying that if Hagler's best opponents hadn't existed, Hagler wouldn't be considered a great fighter.

How much cocaine did you have to sniff in order to vomit this garbage?

If my grandpa had 3 bаlls, he'd be a pinball machine.

 

Muhammad Ali without the other three, Liston, Frazier, and Foreman, he just regular! :rasta

 

Hagler has a better resume than Golovkin.

 

I stand corrected, Ali is still the greatest of all times without Liston, Frazier and Foreman.
What ever could I have been thinking! :silly

 

Leanard was OLD OVERWEIGHT AND BLIND IN ONE EYE and he STILL WON

 

IMO no boxers are MORE OVERRATED THAN THE FAB 4.

 

leonard was 29/30?

 

Not at all. Golovkin doesn't have a John Mugabe on his resume either.

 

nope. if he fights very defensive and just win on points like fmj, i would accept that but hagler fights like a true atg. the other 3 just proved that he is legit. srl even avoided him for some time just to make sure he will have a chance of beating him.

 

Rubbish thread

Hagler would have been an ATG regardless

 

No need to deny your age you big dummy. 64 and still trolling like spoiled teenager.

 

Let's erase Golovkins best 3 opponents and then compare his resume with other greats.