Matchroom Stable not That great!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by second to none, Oct 10, 2013.


Page 2 of 3
  1. ChipChair

    ChipChair Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,231
    0
    Dec 7, 2012
    Second to none in the OP " in no way is it the best in all boxing " id like to know who even claimed it was.
     
    ChipChair, Oct 10, 2013
    ChipChair, Oct 10, 2013
    #16
  2. tdf1974

    tdf1974 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,010
    2,195
    Sep 9, 2013
    i have no idea why people on here think British boxers should all be number 1 in world and in world class fights in every bout!!!

    Britain literally 'punches above its weight' in boxing

    what a pun
     
    tdf1974, Oct 10, 2013
    tdf1974, Oct 10, 2013
    #17
  3. Semi Automatic

    Semi Automatic Guest

    second to none is a trolling wanker who would never dare step into the ring
    the guy has probably never even had a heated argument in his life

    to troll and mock world champions and world class fighters like that shows a lack of respect

    britain have 5 world champs and therell be more to come, i reckon we'll have 7 or 8 next year, we are doing great, guys like Froch, Barker, Burns, Quigg, Mcdonnell are an inspiration to young boxers like myself
     
    Semi Automatic, Oct 10, 2013
    Semi Automatic, Oct 10, 2013
    #18
  4. second to none

    second to none Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,438
    8
    Jul 1, 2013
    Eddie said it at the press conference today for swifty smith said it aswell at the carpe dieme presser, Burns and Quigg arn't world champions well not in my eyes and i can explain, it's not trolling to say Ricky was beaten fair by Beltran and no longer should be world champion, second explain to me how a guy who draws a fight for a bogus regular world title belt is a true world champion, as i said matchroom has quality fighters but show me one thing i said thats bull****
     
    second to none, Oct 10, 2013
    second to none, Oct 10, 2013
    #19
  5. second to none

    second to none Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,438
    8
    Jul 1, 2013
    How is it trolling to say i don't regonise 2 of their world champions, one because we all know he clearly lost to Beltran, the other because he drew a fight for a title i wouldnt class as a world title, Regular belts arnt world titles IMO hows that trolling would people not agree Burns lost and that Regular belts are bull****, Also someone mentioned Haye, he is on sky not a matchroom fighter doesnt he promote himself, I don't see how i was trolling and to call me a **** for just giving an opinion on a forum you'd want to grow up
     
    second to none, Oct 10, 2013
    second to none, Oct 10, 2013
    #20
  6. Ray Dollars

    Ray Dollars Member Full Member

    273
    0
    Jun 7, 2011
    What more could Matchroom really do? They've signed the best out there, and they have a lot of promising fighters coming up too.
     
    Ray Dollars, Oct 10, 2013
    Ray Dollars, Oct 10, 2013
    #21
  7. Kaz_187

    Kaz_187 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1
    Mar 19, 2006
    i dont understand the point of the article, the thread title and this line contradict each other almost straight away:huh, and again i dont think anyone has claimed they have the best stable in boxing.

    i think a more apt title would have been matchroiom stable is abit over rated imo then explain why, article would have made alot more sense
     
    Kaz_187, Oct 11, 2013
    Kaz_187, Oct 11, 2013
    #22
  8. RingToneBoxing

    RingToneBoxing Member Full Member

    322
    2
    Apr 8, 2013
    RingToneBoxing, Oct 11, 2013
    RingToneBoxing, Oct 11, 2013
    #23
  9. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    If Matchroom's stable is not that great, what the **** is Franks?
     
    Solaris, Oct 11, 2013
    Solaris, Oct 11, 2013
    #24
  10. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,279
    2,224
    Apr 25, 2008
    I completely agree about Selby, massively over rated. To be honest I would say the stable is marginally better than fish eye's. The difference is that Sky is still the better platform so these fighters will recieve more hype.
     
    iceferg, Oct 11, 2013
    iceferg, Oct 11, 2013
    #25
  11. Tommy.™

    Tommy.™ Active Member Full Member

    921
    113
    Jul 1, 2013
    It's a stable with a lot of potential. And am I the only one who thinks Kell Brook is quite good? I know he has hasn't stepped up yet but he's only 27 so he has time to build himself up. Senchenko is a good start and if he can get passed him then I can see him getting that shot against Alexander. Tbh though, I would rather see him face another top 147 fighter before going up against Alexander.
     
    Tommy.™, Oct 11, 2013
    Tommy.™, Oct 11, 2013
    #26
  12. rampant

    rampant Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,631
    9
    Feb 24, 2011
    This is something that frustrates me!

    The stable is good and growing, you talk about these fighters like they are not elite, they are either prospects (good) or world or near world level......how **** is that? :huh
     
    rampant, Oct 11, 2013
    rampant, Oct 11, 2013
    #27
  13. Ade_Lad

    Ade_Lad Active Member Full Member

    600
    1
    Mar 26, 2013
    Plz say why you think it's only just better than FW
     
    Ade_Lad, Oct 11, 2013
    Ade_Lad, Oct 11, 2013
    #28
  14. Strongback

    Strongback Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,420
    9
    Nov 6, 2009
    Matchroom isn't interested in quality it is quantity they are after.

    They are trying to buy enough fighters that they can take over British boxing.


    Sky PPV'S and now they want a monopoly on British fighters.


    This will all end in tears.
     
    Strongback, Oct 11, 2013
    Strongback, Oct 11, 2013
    #29
Page 2 of 3