Matthew Hilton vs. Tony Ayala Jr.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dpw417, Apr 2, 2009.


  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,341
    9,959
    Jun 23, 2008
  2. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,838
    6,613
    Dec 10, 2014
    Bombs away.

    Obviously Hilton was more proven as his career actually played out.

    I think these two had similar strengths and weaknesses.

    I'll go with Hilton just because we know what he had. Ayala never faced top level completion so we really don't know.
     
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,334
    15,432
    Jun 9, 2007
  4. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,332
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Hilton wins. Too fast and throw way more punches. Big difference.
     
  5. juppity

    juppity Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,342
    4,349
    Dec 28, 2016
    Prime Hilton was a 80 's version of Lemieux .
    Hilton was very impressive in winning title from Drayton but after that
    fight ill discipline meant he like Ayala he never fulfilled his enormous
    potential. Hilton at his best mauls the bully Ayala and a exhausted
    Ayala does not come out of his corner after 10 rounds.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.