Matthew Saad Muhammad vs. Archie Moore

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Saintpat, Jul 31, 2013.


  1. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,337
    26,533
    Jun 26, 2009
    Who ya got?

    Was Saad durable enough to weather and strong enough to wear down the Mongoose?
     
  2. Anubis

    Anubis Boxing Addict

    5,802
    2,039
    Jun 14, 2008
    Absolutely not! Depending on how aggressive he is, Archie could sent Matt into assisted living with a protracted beating. This isn't Marvin Johnson or Yaqui Lopez we're discussing throwing him in with.

    Sir, I question your sense of humanity! [Then again, I question your sense of humanity throwing poor Matthew in there with virtually any ATG LHW not named Loughran, Rosenbloom, Maxim or Pastrano.]
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  3. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,100
    15,579
    Dec 20, 2006
    NO...Not even if I stretch my Philly bias to the maximum extent.
     
  4. Anubis

    Anubis Boxing Addict

    5,802
    2,039
    Jun 14, 2008
    Then it's The Phantom of Philly against The Ole' Mongoose for you?:think
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,410
    Jul 15, 2008
    With all due respect to Saad, Archie was a giant step up ... no one who got hit as easily as Saad survives Archie Moore ..
     
    Anubis likes this.
  6. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,337
    26,533
    Jun 26, 2009
    I agree that Archie takes him, but not that he overwhelms him. Plenty of fighters of lower caliber than Saad were able to hang in there with Moore, and a few of them beat him. I think Saad falls way behind, probably picks himself off the canvas a time or two, then rallies late to make it interesting.
     
  7. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,927
    824
    Nov 23, 2007
    Archie by Ko, Moore is much better than a game but out classed Saad
     
  8. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,124
    8,572
    Jul 17, 2009
    Moore wins in devastating fashion. Muhammad was super tough,but Archie was better in all departments.
     
  9. janwalshs

    janwalshs Active Member Full Member

    624
    209
    Feb 19, 2010
    If Yvon Durelle could drop Moore multiple times and nearly stop him then Saad would sure have a chance. Saad was a fighting demon who would never quit. Interesting fight to be sure. Moore probably has the edge.
     
  10. Anubis

    Anubis Boxing Addict

    5,802
    2,039
    Jun 14, 2008
    The problem with the Durelle analogy is that Yvon dropped him those multiple times in the opening round.

    Matt ranks alongside Michael Spinks and Carlos Palomino as one of the slowest starting HOF punchers ever, with nary a prime career first round knockout [or even knockdown] between them.

    Archie generated around 16 first round knockouts [his one punch starching of big Embrell Davidson is on youtube] and additional opening round knockdowns. Sure, there were the Morrow I and Durelle I anomalies, but Moore is, I think, entitled to a bit of slack for this in his long career, as he did it far, far more often than it was done to him.

    Saad Muhammad would need to rally from his invariably slow start against an opponent both Hatchetman Sheppard and Tiger Ted Lowry identified as the hardest puncher they ever fought, the only man to ever stop the cagey Bert Whitehurst twice [the second time immediately before a "young" up and coming Liston failed to do it even once].

    This isn't a question of who wins, but how Archie does it. He crushed heavyweight contenders into 1962 [when he ruined Lavorante]. Matt's strictly a LHW, and a slow starting one at that. Moore did get up to knock Durelle out, and he was otherwise on a different level entirely when coming in under 175 after 1951. [He was not conclusively defeated at 175 after Morrow I in 1948, and not by anybody weighing under that limit after Harold Johnson III was decided by the margin of referee Ted Jamieson's ruled foul penalty for a fifth round low blow. If you wanted to manage Archie successfully through multiple bouts at 175, you had better be a peak pre-Baroudi Ezzard Charles.

    Speaking of Baroudi makes me contemplate Lavorante again. Moore sent guys to the hospital. Matt was indeed a fighting demon who would not quit, and also utilized a statuesque upright posture which didn't afford him much defensive evasion. He was also a bleeder. He pays for his guts and availability to get hit here, and likely leaves the arena in an ambulance.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  11. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,337
    26,533
    Jun 26, 2009
    Joey Maxim game him a very good go. Saad is better offensively than Maxim and his equal in the ability to absorb punishment and take a punch. I don't get all the 'Saad gets destroyed' stuff.
     
  12. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,675
    Aug 18, 2012
    Maxim was a different type fighter vs Saad. Boxer vs a puncher.

    Saad was one of my fav fighters back in the 70s....most all his bouts we're shown live on CBS TV. He had tremendous recuperative ability and hit like a hammer with his right. Certainly with that level of power anything could happen but with the best Moore he more than likely gets outboxed and stopped. Moore had similar power and he could box...soften up Saad....before landing a ko blow. Pick here is a slow beat down ending in a sixth round ko.
     
  13. Anubis

    Anubis Boxing Addict

    5,802
    2,039
    Jun 14, 2008
    Maxim-Saad Muhammad would be Saad Muhammad-Conteh I without the late rally and fight saving 14th round knockdowns by Matt. Joey hold wins over two HOF HW Champions. Look at his record. Matthew's not even on the same planet as Maxim. Joey had NINE fights against HOF HW Titlists Charles, Walcott and Patterson, winning two, pushing to SD and MD losses in others, and never sustained a knockdown or stoppage loss in any of them. I'll take Maxim's jab, skills and defense, over Saad's offense any day of the week.

    'Saad gets destroyed' because he nearly got killed twice by both Marvin Johnson and Yaqui Lopez, and got dropped on his face by Ritchie Kates. Taking that kind of punishment against Moore places you on a gurney.

    He went 2-1 against Hatchetman Sheppard, avenging his only stoppage defeat in their rubber match. [Curtis caught him cold that one time in the opening round, something Matthew NEVER did in world class competition.]

    Olson failed to take him out twice when he was pudgy and aging, as Machen also failed to do twice. He beat Satterfield. He split with Bivins, and beat Nardico. Lloyd Marshall couldn't take him out. Moore couldn't stop him in three tries.

    "Saad is...his equal in the ability to absorb punishment and take a punch." Are you certain Saad Muhammad goes the limit with all the guys Joey did as often as Maxim did it, from Bivins I and Sheppard I in 1942 to Machen I & II and Olson II in 1957? [Check out Eddie's late 1956 knockout of Nino Valdes on youtube to achieve a full realization of who Maxim took the limit in back to backs the following year.]
     
  14. leverage

    leverage Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    15
    Dec 27, 2006
    Moore at his best gives saad Muhammad a methodical, gradual beating. Archie had too much skill for him, not to mention he was a great ko puncher. Muhammad could take a punch I couldn't see him taking moores punches for too many rounds.
     
  15. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    Moore methodically takes apart Matthew, but his fighting spirit keeps him upright for a unanimous decision loss.