Max Baer vs. Lamon Brewster

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Sep 22, 2008.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,046
    Apr 1, 2007
  2. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Baer. More power, better chin and Brwester isn´t that far better in terms of skill to make this a deciding factor.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,954
    24,910
    Jan 3, 2007
    After watching several of Baers fights on film, I truthfully would not give him much of a chance at beating most of the modern top raters. His defense sucked and he had no jab. His punches were wide, looping shots and he was not particularly quick on his feet either.

    I like the more athletic and technicially sound Brewster to take this one.

    Here is some footage of both.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2DWswsfpmI

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u76XeY2ZhcU
     
  4. Ramon Rojo

    Ramon Rojo Active Member Full Member

    624
    22
    Dec 5, 2005
    Brewster by KO early


    He was a decent boxer in his own time, but he sucks by modern standards.
     
  5. dabox

    dabox Active Member Full Member

    737
    10
    Oct 17, 2007
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I have to agree here. Brewster was a bit more durable as well, which is always a key factor when two punchers go toe to toe.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,528
    27,124
    Feb 15, 2006
    Of course that is what many people said about Baer in his own time but when it came to the crunch they had no answer for what he brought.
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,528
    27,124
    Feb 15, 2006
    I dont know how you figure that.

    I would have asumed that everybody would give Baer the edge in durability.
     
  9. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Baer was stopped by both Louis and Nova. Brewster has only been down in one fight, against an extremely aggressive Wlad Klitschko, who probably was as dangerous a puncher as Joe Louis when he spent that gigantic amount of energy. Other than that, he's never been down, and he had to face much bigger men than Baer did.
     
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    Both people had top chins. Both people had a lot of power. Maybe Bear hit a little harder. Brewster had more skills, and a bit more speed.

    The main differences between the two are Brewster had more heart, and was much harder to discourage to the point where he gave up on winning. Brewster also had a better defense. I think Brewster win a decision or score a late round TKO.
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,954
    24,910
    Jan 3, 2007
    We are not comparing him to fighters of his own time.....
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,954
    24,910
    Jan 3, 2007
    The only real destroyer that Baer ever fought was a 20-0 novice in Joe Louis who dispatched him in a mere 4 rounds when Baer was in his prime. His other defeats came against men with far less power or punching ability. Therefore, I view his Legendary durability as being well overrated.
     
  13. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,666
    2,146
    Aug 26, 2004
    Brewster looked good vs Vlad in 1 and Golota but Baer was a tough puncher and when he was fit he could fight. Luckily for Brewster he did not have to fight an acurate power puncher like Joe LOuis or he would have been chopped up and spit out early. Watching Brewster vsKali Mehan, Sergie Lackavitch and Vlad in his last fight, I think he would have been too much of a target for Max and the punches Lamon takes could be dangerous vs Baer
     
  14. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    28
    Jan 29, 2008
    This fight could have gone either way. Each guy could hit -- especially Baer -- but given each fighter's excellent durability, I don't think it would have ended in knockout. Whichever boxer has the better night would probably take the fight on points.

    I personally don't think Baer was especially good, even though he could bang and he was tough. I disagree with the many other fans who regard Baer as having had the potential to be great. Baer always struck me as lacking in polish and fluidity.