Max Kellerman: "I have yet to see a fight in which i thought marquez was beaten"

If you not here to discuss the topic, I'm asking you nicely to move on elsewhere yourself. Divac did not instigate this thread, I did, so he is quite justified to bring his opinions on the Pacquiao and Marquez fights in here without being scrutinized.

What is your opinion on Juan Manuel Marquez?

 

I was counting on you having a different opinion than me and Divac. I couldn't careless what you said, I'd just rather you give us your opinion on the topic at hand rather than making comments about Divac. Leave it out.

 

It's a good point in the context of the official scoring, but plays little factor in how the public and ringside observors scored the fight. For instance, I scored the opening round 10-6, and still had Marquez dominating the majority of the fight and in doing so rallying back for a one point win.

 

That is exactly what I just said. :good According to the judges, if no mistakes were made, Pacquiao won the fight.

With no mistakes, according to Max Kellerman, Myself, and a lot of ringside observors, Juan Manuel won the fight.

 

I think the majority of the time, they do.

 

I don't believe Juan Manuel Marquez should be considered greater than Barrera and Morales, but I feel Marquez to be superior to Pacquiao and Hamed. Morales and Barrera have far greater resumes than Juan Manuel, and you could argue so does Hamed and Pacquiao. The difference being for me is that I had Marquez winning both fights, and Hamed was never in the same class those three. Had he fought any one of those three, they would have all done the same thing that Barrera done. Hamed was to vunerable to getting hit, and was not nearly as ellusive as people suggest. He got tagged in every fight he was in, even at domestic level.