Yes, they don't "fly" with you because you are downright psychotic in your hatred towards Pacquiao, to the point of it being disturbing. Holding losses of guys in their first year of boxing ever when they are malnourished kid not even 19 years old (something YOU fail to mention) in any way whatsoever is just pathetic hater talk, plain and simple. It's not a bad loss. It's not a "good" loss. It's just an (understandable) loss Holding KO losses against a heavy-handed Thai who was considered a good boxer at the time and came from a family of fighters is not a bad loss, you weirdo. Holding a loss to Erick Morales because "he was like, washed maaaaa~n" is dumb and disrespectful of a veteran who was a great boxer seeing a vulnerability in a come-forward fighter and being able to exploit it. The only loss you have where it was a "bad one" is Jeff Horn, and since I agree with that I don't know why you keep harping on it other than your disturbing "I HATE PACQUIAO" behavior, especially since I also agreed that Pac isn't the GOAT and never will be no matter what he does from here on out. PLEASE stop being a weirdo about this. It makes talking to you about Pacquiao so goddamn tedious. There are plenty of reasons to say Manny Pacquiao isn't and won't be the GOAT and not a single one of them involves tearing him down or painting him with some weird "if he was THAT good then he'd never lose to X no excuses only losers lose that's why it's called losing lol" brush. Guess we have to disqualify Ray Robinson from ATG/GOAT status for that Turpin loss; he was supposed to destroy that guy after all. Nope, don't care that there was a rematch, he was supposed to ko that dude by round 8! Clearly overrated. Those last couple of sentences are what you sound like. Note how crazy it sounds.